OT - Covid

Status
Not open for further replies.

PhiDawg

Member
Aug 2, 2023
110
96
28
Totally wrong. COVID was science in real time and in the raw. The public generally never sees that.
I remember saying here and elsewhere in early Feb 2020 this would be a big problem for the clinically weak (elderly and 300 pounders). I was more right than not. Not sure what science in real time means. If we wanted to see patterns and facts, they were staring us in the face.
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
6,689
3,874
113
I remember saying here and elsewhere in early Feb 2020 this would be a big problem for the clinically weak (elderly and 300 pounders). I was more right than not. Not sure what science in real time means. If we wanted to see patterns and facts, they were staring us in the face.
Can I get you to help with stock purchases too? That wasn't hard to predict, since literally every other disease is like that. We learned a LOT after Feb 2020. We are still learning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vandaldawg

Boom Boom

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
1,942
1,091
113
Yes, but there was plenty of good info that was ignored because it didn't fit what was expected. For example, an outbreak in Korea was traced to one person who attended a church service, where several dozen people caught it. That is clear aerosol transmission, but doctors bent over backwards to explain it as oh they all touched the same surfaces. They expected it to transmit by contact, so they saw what they wanted to see in the evidence. There's reasons for this bias that go back a couple hundred years (miasma), so it's understandable, but a good bit maddening too as these are supposed to be the professionals that are above that.

I think this one is now understood at least at the top of the chain, so I do not expect this error to ever repeat. The bias on pathogenic evolution though is not any better than it was before. If you vaccinate a population against a pathogen, then that pathogen will evolve in response, but also which existing variants take hold and spread will be changed as well (which plays into evolution). As far as I can tell this is still not understood.
A lot of the early stuff that came out on this came from China. There was a lot of, shall we say, misinformation, coming from there.
 

PhiDawg

Member
Aug 2, 2023
110
96
28
Can I get you to help with stock purchases too? That wasn't hard to predict, since literally every other disease is like that. We learned a LOT after Feb 2020. We are still learning.
Yes. It evolved into the flu just like folks in Feb 2020 said it would.
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
6,689
3,874
113
Yes. It evolved into the flu just like folks in Feb 2020 said it would.
No, it didn't. It's still the third leading cause of death in the US. The flu is way behind that. It's still WAY more contagious than the flu. Where it's probably headed is toward the common cold. There is reason to believe that the other coronaviruses that cause some of the common cold sparked pandemics in our past. There is one from the late 1800s that is supposed to be from one of those I believe.
 
Last edited:

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
6,689
3,874
113
Yes, but there was plenty of good info that was ignored because it didn't fit what was expected. For example, an outbreak in Korea was traced to one person who attended a church service, where several dozen people caught it. That is clear aerosol transmission, but doctors bent over backwards to explain it as oh they all touched the same surfaces. They expected it to transmit by contact, so they saw what they wanted to see in the evidence. There's reasons for this bias that go back a couple hundred years (miasma), so it's understandable, but a good bit maddening too as these are supposed to be the professionals that are above that.

I think this one is now understood at least at the top of the chain, so I do not expect this error to ever repeat. The bias on pathogenic evolution though is not any better than it was before. If you vaccinate a population against a pathogen, then that pathogen will evolve in response, but also which existing variants take hold and spread will be changed as well (which plays into evolution). As far as I can tell this is still not understood.
If I remember that case correctly, I believe it involved a self-service buffet meal and a lot of close physical contact. They actually did have a basis for what they said. Vaccination makes it harder for a pathogen to evolve by the way, fewer hosts and just as importantly, not as sick hosts. That does NOT mean it won't evolve. We never even came close to the level of vaccination worldwide with covid for that to come into play unfortunately. We will never know if universal vaccination would have helped. It probably wasn't possible anyway. For starters, all 8 billion would probably have to have been vaccinated within about a month of each other.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: vandaldawg

PhiDawg

Member
Aug 2, 2023
110
96
28
No, it didn't. It's still the third leading cause of death in the US. The flu is way behind that. It's still WAY more contagious than the flu. Where it's probably headed is toward the common cold. There is reason to believe that the other coronaviruses that cause some of the common cold sparked pandemics in our past. There is one from the late 1800s that is supposed to be from one of those I believe.
It’s not the third leading cause of death in the US. The data was/is adulterated. It’s impossible to know which covid deaths are legit. Fauci/Birx made a mess of the coding years ago. This is all established fact.

Technically, George Floyd was a covid death if you can believe that.
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
6,689
3,874
113
It’s not the third leading cause of death in the US. The data was/is adulterated. It’s impossible to know which covid deaths are legit. Fauci/Birx made a mess of the coding years ago. This is all established fact.

Technically, George Floyd was a covid death if you can believe that.
Oh good grief, you can win any argument you want to like that. My facts are untrue but yours are established, I got you now. LOL! No farther debate needed here.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,666
3,560
113
Food for thought….most medicine peddled by MDs is outdated. Never felt that way until the covid response forced me to open my eyes.
Um...what?
Are you using 'most' the same way my kids use 'literally'? Because if you are, then sure I could agree with your claim. But if you are using 'most' as in 'over 50%', then your claim is bonkers.

Here are 10 of the most commonly prescribed medications in the US. Lemme know what/how most are outdated.

Atorvastatin (Lipitor)
Lisinopril (Prinivil, Zestril)
Albuterol (Accuneb, Ventolin, Proair, Proventil)
Levothyroxine (Synthroid, Unithroid, Levoxyl, Levo-T, Euthyrox)
Amlodipine (Norvasc, Amvaz)

Gabapentin (Neurontin)
Omeprazole (Prilosec)
Metformin (Glucophage)
Losartan (Cozaar)

Hydrocodone / Acetaminophen (Zolvit, Lorcet, Vicodin, Hycet, Xodol, Norco, Lortab, Maxidone)
 

PhiDawg

Member
Aug 2, 2023
110
96
28
Um...what?
Are you using 'most' the same way my kids use 'literally'? Because if you are, then sure I could agree with your claim. But if you are using 'most' as in 'over 50%', then your claim is bonkers.

Here are 10 of the most commonly prescribed medications in the US. Lemme know what/how most are outdated.

Atorvastatin (Lipitor)
Lisinopril (Prinivil, Zestril)
Albuterol (Accuneb, Ventolin, Proair, Proventil)
Levothyroxine (Synthroid, Unithroid, Levoxyl, Levo-T, Euthyrox)
Amlodipine (Norvasc, Amvaz)

Gabapentin (Neurontin)
Omeprazole (Prilosec)
Metformin (Glucophage)
Losartan (Cozaar)

Hydrocodone / Acetaminophen (Zolvit, Lorcet, Vicodin, Hycet, Xodol, Norco, Lortab, Maxidone)
Statin use is overblown. Cholesterol is a poor biomarker for CVD and the literature over the last 20 plus years backs it up.

Here’s a big metaanalysis of 21 RCTs on LDL-C




Never wouldve question my provider but our covid response gave me doubt.
 
Last edited:

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,382
2,629
113
Part of being a conservative is having a conservative temperament about change and new public policy ideas. But a subset of conservatives, typically not the most broadly educated, are incredibly cynical and see conspiracies and selfish actors everywhere who are out to screw over all the good liberty loving people. The minute some lunatic leftoid says some bizarre and not-likely to happen, the conspiracy-minded "conservative" social media outlets and talk radio try to scare the crap out of people by telling them "they're sending drag queens to take your gas stoves" or some nonsense like that you won't see in but only a few places (fyi, I don't think drag queen story hour belongs in schools. That's just weird). It's almost like they've given up on the belief that in a democracy you should vote for and elect people who can prevent all sorts of stuff from happening by passing legislation. Maybe the Republican Party's emphasis mainly on tax cuts, limits on abortion and easy access to guns and not much else makes people think they don't care about a lot of policy issues. Or maybe they're electing far right lunatics who scare the hell out of ordinary Americans who just want to enjoy their lives without having to think politically and cynically throughout each day.

I agree. Government institutions and leaders should be more honest. Fauci lied and exaggerated, along with others, because they likely think that's the only way to get some people to behave responsibly. I also find it odd that Trump pushed a quick vaccine, let Fauci do what he wanted and shut down wide swaths of the economy and schools and yet he's still the Chosen One for many who think he's gonna fix our problems. But his appeal is his personality. He's like a pro wrestler with mic skills.

Those two points are not unrelated. Those were people that generally trusted the government (for all the complaints about politicians) and in particular trusted the medical community. That trust all got shattered in a short time frame, and those people are the least able to be able to look at the underlying data themselves (which is not all that important b/c most people can't on difficult questions) or more importantly, know a highly educated specialist that they can trust.

I still contend the biggest problem with COVID was that we had so many government officials that are supposedly educated and bright that were too dumb to realize how valuable credibility is. They shredded it for minimal gain (if any), even ignoring the effects of lack of trust. We have basically stopped offering the flu shot at work because our workers no longer get it. They did before, because that's what was recommended. Now that's not good enough. You can't segment trust. You are either trustworthy or not, and you don't get to say, yeah, we were misleading and politicized for COVID, but the Flu info is still good.
 

PhiDawg

Member
Aug 2, 2023
110
96
28
Those two points are not unrelated. Those were people that generally trusted the government (for all the complaints about politicians) and in particular trusted the medical community. That trust all got shattered in a short time frame, and those people are the least able to be able to look at the underlying data themselves (which is not all that important b/c most people can't on difficult questions) or more importantly, know a highly educated specialist that they can trust.

I still contend the biggest problem with COVID was that we had so many government officials that are supposedly educated and bright that were too dumb to realize how valuable credibility is. They shredded it for minimal gain (if any), even ignoring the effects of lack of trust. We have basically stopped offering the flu shot at work because our workers no longer get it. They did before, because that's what was recommended. Now that's not good enough. You can't segment trust. You are either trustworthy or not, and you don't get to say, yeah, we were misleading and politicized for COVID, but the Flu info is still good.
Amen!
 

thatsbaseball

Well-known member
May 29, 2007
16,740
4,356
113
FWIW both of us got the first three shots. We both got Covid in August of 22. We both did Paxlovid and got over it pretty quick with mild symptoms. My wife hated Paxlovid and probably wouldn't do it again and I didn't have a lot of trouble with it. We're both over 70 and when I asked my doctor about the current vaccine he said he wouldn't recommend it but thought I'd be OK if I took it. Neither of us has taken it yet.
 

paindonthurt

Well-known member
Jun 27, 2009
9,529
2,045
113
The flu vaccine and Covid Vaccine are not meant to prevent someone from getting the disease. They are meant to arm their immune system to keep the disease from getting severe. I’m glad you have had such good luck with not catching COVID and hope it continues for you. I wish all of us could be that lucky.
Agree with this and thanks for saying, but this isn’t what they told us when they tried to shame everyone into taking it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bully 16

paindonthurt

Well-known member
Jun 27, 2009
9,529
2,045
113
I am 41, wife 36, 6 yo, and 21 month old. As far as I know, none of us have had it. Wife has been tested probably 10 times and always come back negative. Wife and I took vaccine before baby was born at the strong urging of her ob doctor because my wife was high risk, and friends neighbor who was my age died right before wife had their baby. I couldn’t imagine doing that to my wife knowing I didn’t at least try.

I would not have taken it if she had not been pregnant. I think at risk demographics needed to probably take it, but I also think that the politicalization of Covid and its aftermath is/was sick. There were a lot of people from that period that used it for their own benefit.

Here is my question. How/why do some of the population keep getting this? I know nobody knows, but it’s just crazy. I am so thankful that kid’s really didn’t suffer from it. My two are essentially a biological weapon for me and the wife. Older one is finally understanding germs to an extent.
They get it the same way people get the flu multiple times.

It’s probably worse now bc it’s newer and less immunity.
 

Dawgtruc

Active member
Sep 8, 2018
1,117
232
58
Nobody talks about the potential downsides?

I'll clue you in on something- when people continually say 'we can't talk about X', what is happening is X is being talked about.
And in this instance, X has been talked about to death(pun not intended).

Don't get boosters if you don't want em, but don't make it seem like your view is being silenced.
I’m sorry, but Nobody talks about the young, well-conditioned athletes that have dropped dead from blood clots after being double-vaxxed, triple boosted ….just do your research, mostly soccer players which were under a mandate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrKotter and Fang1

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,411
2,676
113
It’s not the third leading cause of death in the US. The data was/is adulterated. It’s impossible to know which covid deaths are legit. Fauci/Birx made a mess of the coding years ago. This is all established fact.

Technically, George Floyd was a covid death if you can believe that.
I heard "folks" say George Floyd died after being vaccinated. Folks said that. Always trust folks when they say stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vandaldawg

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,411
2,676
113
I’m sorry, but Nobody talks about the young, well-conditioned athletes that have dropped dead from blood clots after being double-vaxxed, triple boosted ….just do your research, mostly soccer players which were under a mandate.
Who are some of those athletes? Please talk about them. FYI, it's been discussed and studied. Maybe it's the conclusions reached that aren't talked about by the "nobody talks about" crowd: "Conclusion SCD rate among young US athletes in 2021-2022 was comparable to pre-pandemic estimates. There is currently no evidence to substantiate a link between (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccination and SCD in (young) athletes." https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.02.13.23285851v1
 
  • Like
Reactions: vandaldawg

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,382
2,629
113
"folks" said that. Stop listening to those "folks." Covid didn't evolve into the flu. Those are different viruses.
Nobody was claiming it would somehow turn into a flu virus. They were claiming it would be endemic and essentially be another flu once it had made the rounds for a while and everybody had some prior exposure.
 

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,411
2,676
113
Those two points are not unrelated. Those were people that generally trusted the government (for all the complaints about politicians) and in particular trusted the medical community. That trust all got shattered in a short time frame, and those people are the least able to be able to look at the underlying data themselves (which is not all that important b/c most people can't on difficult questions) or more importantly, know a highly educated specialist that they can trust.

I still contend the biggest problem with COVID was that we had so many government officials that are supposedly educated and bright that were too dumb to realize how valuable credibility is. They shredded it for minimal gain (if any), even ignoring the effects of lack of trust. We have basically stopped offering the flu shot at work because our workers no longer get it. They did before, because that's what was recommended. Now that's not good enough. You can't segment trust. You are either trustworthy or not, and you don't get to say, yeah, we were misleading and politicized for COVID, but the Flu info is still good.
Conservatism has an intellectual basis outside of talk radio and cable news. It's interesting and thoughtful and seems to have been abandoned (see Patrick Allitt's "The Conservatives for an overview") in favor of championship-wrestling style personalities. Genuine conservatism is an attitude about change that says one should be suspicious about the consequences of excessively optimistic left-wing policies, not the reasonable ones. Authorities and expertise are valued and not immediately dismissed by reactionaries who, for instance, look to find one scientist out of 50 who disagrees with something generally accepted among the scientific community. A broad based education enables one to understand that and to become less susceptible to charlatans and slogans. FYI, I don't think some of the leftoids have a broad-based education. Liberals do and there are thoughtful liberals with good ideas. I was taught by some good liberals at State along with smart conservatives.
 

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,411
2,676
113
Nobody was claiming it would somehow turn into a flu virus. They were claiming it would be endemic and essentially be another flu once it had made the rounds for a while and everybody had some prior exposure.
"evolve into the flu" is a claim. If they meant it would become less virulent, as happens to viruses over time, and will likely have a similar impact to seasonal flu or the common cold then they should write that. Not a fan of someone making a bold claim with absolute certainty when referring to "folks" or "they say" without identifying anyone.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,666
3,560
113
I’m sorry, but Nobody talks about the young, well-conditioned athletes that have dropped dead from blood clots after being double-vaxxed, triple boosted ….just do your research, mostly soccer players which were under a mandate.
Nobody talks about them?
For the last 3 years, every time some athlete dies or even has an issue, covid vaccination is discussed.
And by discussed, I mean people come out of the woodwork to happily claim, almost always without any knowledge on the situation, that the medical incident was due to the jab.
It's like clockwork.

Heck, go look at the Bronny James thread on SPS 3 or 4 months ago. A bunch of people on a Mississippi State message board were confidently declaring and/or agreeing that the jab made him collapse.
As if anyone here had insight.
While in that thread, look at the study from 2016 that shows how frequent heart issues are in young athletes. 2016 is pre-covid.
 

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
22,579
10,373
113
We needed someone with a cool head to bring us together through a horrible time. Think Winston Churchill with the fireside chats. Instead what we got were a bunch of morons in DC using it as a political football and turning us against each other for their own gain. And I mean both sides.
Barack Obama Applause GIF by Obama
 

PhiDawg

Member
Aug 2, 2023
110
96
28
"evolve into the flu" is a claim. If they meant it would become less virulent, as happens to viruses over time, and will likely have a similar impact to seasonal flu or the common cold then they should write that. Not a fan of someone making a bold claim with absolute certainty when referring to "folks" or "they say" without identifying anyone.
"folks" "folks" "folks" "folks"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Podgy

bulldoghair

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2013
1,088
641
108
I stand corrected. You've cited a reliable source, a genuinely reasonable man of science and not a total lunatic the medical and scientific community laughs at and whose name you misspelled. FYI, science is self-correcting. It sometimes takes a while, and scientists disagree, but they typically don't look to buffoons like Kennedy for guidance.
What did he say in the quote I provided that is inaccurate?
Also, something tells me you wore a mask for a really long time thinking that it was scientific and non-buffoonery behavior.
 

bulldoghair

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2013
1,088
641
108
That’s my personal experience also, but I just chalk that up to people less likely to get the vaccine being less likely to get tested.
We’ve had several colds in our house since the hysteria died down and any one of them could have been Covid. But there’s not much point in testing for it.

But the people that were hysterical about Covid are still getting tested for Covid, so of course it feels like everybody getting Covid multiple times was vaxxed.
That’s fair enough. But from my observation with working with the public, the ones getting actually sick the most often and the sickest seem to be the folks who got or get all these vaccines.
 

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,411
2,676
113
What did he say in the quote I provided that is inaccurate?
Also, something tells me you wore a mask for a really long time thinking that it was scientific and non-buffoonery behavior.
I wore a mask and a MAGA hat.
 

jwtorch

New member
Jun 15, 2023
11
2
3
I trying to remember this with some buddies, there was a tiny private school on the north side of the lake (i'm assuming in Yalobusha County, possibly near Coffeville?) up through the early 80s. I swear we played them in basketball, but none of my friends remember it. Any ideas? Looks like there was a Yalobusha Academy at some point.
Yeah it was YA. Had several friends that went there. I went to Calhoun City (my pop was principal there for a long time). Some of the folks I knew that had gone to Grenada Lake Academy ended up at YA after GLA closed.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,666
3,560
113
Again, what did he say that was inaccurate in the quote I provided?
please understand that even if a lunatic says something non-controversial, that doesn’t mean the person is not a lunatic overall and it also doesn’t mean the person is non-controversial overall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vandaldawg

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
6,689
3,874
113
Slow but much better. I did not start this to spark debate but to inform my friends and see if Covid was ramping up as it is here. At my wife’s facility they went from zero cases to 4 - 10 - 14 - over 20 in around a week.
We had a bump a month or so ago around here. It wasn't as big as the ones in 20, 21, or 22 thank God. It never goes completely away though, and probably won't in our lifetime. Been worried about you. Glad you are doing better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login