OT: global stability seems to be wobbling a bit

DoggieDaddy13

Well-known member
Dec 23, 2017
2,789
1,091
113
This thread is about to get locked because it’s devolved into petty personal attacks. Shame because it was a good thread for a while.
This may be a stupid question, but what is keeping Ukraine, as part of a peace deal, from ceding some of the territory and immediately joining NATO? I know no one wants to lose territory, but joining NATO would put a quick stop to that.
Also, I think at one point in his first term Trump talked about withdrawing from NATO but I haven’t heard anything about that lately. Was that a serious possibility? Is it still a possibility? I don’t love the idea.
Don't know if Trump is serious about withdrawing from NATO, but you can bet all hell would break lose in Europe if the U.S. decided to get out.

Two things:
Ukraine is not only not willing to cede territory, they want (and need) the Crimea back to compete for energy dollars in Europe. Otherwise they are merely a larger version of Moldova.
Russia, even if it were to keep the Crimea along with Donetsk and Luhansk, would never allow Ukraine to join NATO. At worst they would need assurances that Ukraine will remain unaffiliated - a fat chance at this juncture. They cannot afford to have NATO that close to Moscow but more importantly that close to their strategic oil fields in and around Volgograd. And they'd quickly lose access to the Black Sea if a conflict with NATO were to breakout, so their Navy would be worthless.

But Trump will have all of this negotiated and ironed out within 24 hours of taking office in January. He said so and we gotta believe.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: L4Dawg

DoggieDaddy13

Well-known member
Dec 23, 2017
2,789
1,091
113
Don't know if Trump is serious about withdrawing from NATO, but you can bet all hell would break lose in Europe if the U.S. decided to get out.

Two things:
Ukraine is not only not willing to cede territory, they want (and need) the Crimea back to compete for energy dollars in Europe. Otherwise they are merely a larger version of Moldova.
Russia, even if it were to keep the Crimea along with Donetsk and Luhansk, would never allow Ukraine to join NATO. At worst they would need assurances that Ukraine will remain unaffiliated - a fat chance at this juncture. They cannot afford to have NATO that close to Moscow but more importantly that close to their strategic oil fields in and around Volgograd. And they'd quickly lose access to the Black Sea if a conflict with NATO were to break out, so their Navy would be worthless.

But Trump will have all of this negotiated and ironed out within 24 hours of taking office in January. He said so and we gotta believe.
 

Darryl Steight

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
1,803
2,794
113
Noem is there for the pouty lips, fake eyelashes and decent body. Homan will run that $h!+.
I'm wondering if this is a setup. DHS is on the chopping block anyway, so maybe he didn't want to appoint someone he wants on his team long term to take the fall. Not to mention she'll be easier on the eyes in the cabinet meetings than Homan until then.
 

Darryl Steight

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
1,803
2,794
113
But Trump will have all of this negotiated and ironed out within 24 hours of taking office in January. He said so and we gotta believe.

I'm loving this new preemptive 'gotcha' line from the left: "Trump said he would do _____ so if he doesn't do exactly that, by exactly that date, he's a complete failure!!!!1!!" You all just can't wait to I-told-you-so everyone to death if he ever misses.

But yet, back in the real world, y'all supported Joe f'ing Biden and Kamala Harris, those highly regarded wizards of gettin shiit done. Whew boy.
 

DoggieDaddy13

Well-known member
Dec 23, 2017
2,789
1,091
113
I'm loving this new preemptive 'gotcha' line from the left: "Trump said he would do _____ so if he doesn't do exactly that, by exactly that date, he's a complete failure!!!!1!!" You all just can't wait to I-told-you-so everyone to death if he ever misses.

But yet, back in the real world, y'all supported Joe f'ing Biden and Kamala Harris, those highly regarded wizards of gettin shiit done. Whew boy.
Dude! WTF? I believe Trump can and will do it. He's going put the screws to the comedian and put Putin on notice.

Don't doubt it. Watch it happen. He will have it worked out before he takes office.

Now, I think he'll keep us in NATO. We just won't have to pay as much. But if we get out, so be it. Europe ain't our problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BulldawgFan

Darryl Steight

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
1,803
2,794
113
Dude! WTF? I believe Trump can and will do it. He's going put the screws to the comedian and put Putin on notice.

Don't doubt it. Watch it happen. He will have it worked out before he takes office.

Now, I think he'll keep us in NATO. We just won't have to pay as much. But if we get out, so be it. Europe ain't our problem.
Good deal. Congrats on choosing the red pill.
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,365
2,604
113
I'm loving this new preemptive 'gotcha' line from the left: "Trump said he would do _____ so if he doesn't do exactly that, by exactly that date, he's a complete failure!!!!1!!" You all just can't wait to I-told-you-so everyone to death if he ever misses.

But yet, back in the real world, y'all supported Joe f'ing Biden and Kamala Harris, those highly regarded wizards of gettin shiit done. Whew boy.
Not to mention Barry "I will lower insurance premiums by $5,000 on average" Obama. I'm sure W and Slick Willy and H all said similarly ridiculous detached from reality stuff too.
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,365
2,604
113
He's stress testing what the new senate will let him get away with. Only logical explanation. That or he senile. Also possible.
I think he was deeply scarred by Sessions and Barr but learned the wrong lessons. Sessions got outwitted by partisan members of the DOJ and it gave the Russia hoax legs and was a huge part of Trump's first term being derailed. I think the lesson he probably should have learned was that he needs somebody both experienced and strong willed. Again, he's in a tough spot because it'd be hard for him to identify somebody that is well versed in the DOJ and also be confident they are not corrupt. I don't know how much Gaetz has actually practiced. I would assume basically not at all in the areas most relevant to the AG position. Hopefully he knows people he can trust that have more relevant experience.

But again, this is another one of those picks where it'd be hard to do worse than the status quo. As much as people bitched about McConnell not giving Garland a vote, everybody, regardless of political stripe, should be glad he is not on the Supreme Court. The worst case scenario (and probably fairly likely scenario), is that Gaetz is incapable of reigning in or effectively administering the DOJ, and they are just less efficient at abusing their powers than they are now.
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
6,633
3,833
113
I think he was deeply scarred by Sessions and Barr but learned the wrong lessons. Sessions got outwitted by partisan members of the DOJ and it gave the Russia hoax legs and was a huge part of Trump's first term being derailed. I think the lesson he probably should have learned was that he needs somebody both experienced and strong willed. Again, he's in a tough spot because it'd be hard for him to identify somebody that is well versed in the DOJ and also be confident they are not corrupt. I don't know how much Gaetz has actually practiced. I would assume basically not at all in the areas most relevant to the AG position. Hopefully he knows people he can trust that have more relevant experience.

But again, this is another one of those picks where it'd be hard to do worse than the status quo. As much as people bitched about McConnell not giving Garland a vote, everybody, regardless of political stripe, should be glad he is not on the Supreme Court. The worst case scenario (and probably fairly likely scenario), is that Gaetz is incapable of reigning in or effectively administering the DOJ, and they are just less efficient at abusing their powers than they are now.
That pick is just insanity. You can try, but it's insane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thatsbaseball

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,638
3,522
113
But again, this is another one of those picks where it'd be hard to do worse than the status quo. As much as people bitched about McConnell not giving Garland a vote, everybody, regardless of political stripe, should be glad he is not on the Supreme Court.
Nope, the end doesn’t justify the means. What McConnell did was and still is deplorable.
In what is a circus, he all too gladly put on a clown suit.

The worst case scenario (and probably fairly likely scenario), is that Gaetz is incapable of reigning in or effectively administering the DOJ, and they are just less efficient at abusing their powers than they are now.
The worst case scenario is that Gaetz can’t reign in what is happening at the DOJ, and they somehow then abuse their powers less? That is an odd conclusion to predict.
 

ckDOG

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2007
8,371
2,778
113
Don't worry, they're going to ram everyone through by recess appointments. Bada bing, bada boom.
Yep. And the senate will sit idly by and take it rather than pro forma sessions or court. They'll get to grumble in disapproval but ultimately let a president do what he wants unchecked. They are too scared to cross him even if they think it's the right thing to do.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,638
3,522
113
I'm loving this new preemptive 'gotcha' line from the left: "Trump said he would do _____ so if he doesn't do exactly that, by exactly that date, he's a complete failure!!!!1!!" You all just can't wait to I-told-you-so everyone to death if he ever misses.

But yet, back in the real world, y'all supported Joe f'ing Biden and Kamala Harris, those highly regarded wizards of gettin shiit done. Whew boy.
What you are complaining about is not unique to 2024 or Trump.
This is how it goes for people that beat a one term leader.
A ton was promised on the campaign trail, and all the ineptitude of the current administration was highlighted.

When you run on the promise of being able to easily change everything that is wrong, well, then you should be judged on that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dorndawg

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
6,633
3,833
113
Yep. And the senate will sit idly by and take it rather than pro forma sessions or court. They'll get to grumble in disapproval but ultimately let a president do what he wants unchecked. They are too scared to cross him even if they think it's the right thing to do.
They crossed him with Thune. I think that's what today's appointments are all about.
 

ckDOG

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2007
8,371
2,778
113
or someone who has no idea how many were voting for the lesser of two evils
He's going to end up with less than half of the popular vote (by a **** hair). If there is a mandate, I'd say it is "fix immigration and cost of living - sleepy joe isn't up for it". But it definitely wasn't a mandate to hire the circus and stress the constitution. Never a dull moment with this guy - that's for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mstateglfr

85Bears

Well-known member
Jan 12, 2020
1,673
1,519
108
He's going to end up with less than half of the popular vote (by a **** hair). If there is a mandate, I'd say it is "fix immigration and cost of living - sleepy joe isn't up for it". But it definitely wasn't a mandate to hire the circus and stress the constitution. Never a dull moment with this guy - that's for sure.
Now do blinken garland rachel levine
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login