OT: Pray for the young men of Jackson.

dog12

Active member
Sep 15, 2016
1,820
459
83
so lets just say that we all %100 agree that the lack of father figures in the household is the #1 problem... all of these young men seem to be between the ages of 17 and 23... the doc didn't address it but im sure many of them have infants or young kids at home... if these guys decided to stay with their babies mommas and raise their kids, how many of the kids would come out, later in life, any different from these guys? not trying to sound like a a$$hole here, a legitimate question....
Here's my position/argument:

If a young father decides to stay at home with the mother of his child, then the child will be better off and will come out better in the long term.

By deciding to stay at home, the father is accepting responsibility (at least to some degree) for the wellfare of his child and the child's mother.

Hopefully, because the child witnessed his/her mother and father staying at home and raising him/her, the child will also choose to stay at home and raise his/her children.

It might take multiple generations to get such families back into "normal" family life, but it would eventually happen.

There is no quick fix for this problem.
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,234
2,461
113
The Rebublic is in a death spiral and it is not because of China, Russia, Biden, Trump, the far left, the far right or any other buzz words the dumb fricks in the media throw out. It is 100% because of how ignorant the American public has become and its only going to get worse, cause it ain't no cure for the Dumb arse and this country is eat up with it.
Again, rats respond to incentives. People in the US aren't too dumb to respond to incentives. If it's easier to work than not, people will work. If it's easier to not work than to work, a large number of people will not work, and also engage in other socially destructive activities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darryl Steight

Seinfeld

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
9,542
3,585
113
Society is simply coming unwound. People have been trained not to work, mental illness is at an all time high, government handouts are out of control, people simply don't care about other people more than ever. They've learned how to game the system. Oh, and population is a major cause.
And the demographic with the highest suicide rate by a wide margin in the country is the one that is commonly referred to as the most privileged.

I say that to say that I agree with you. There is a lot of *** backwards thinking in today’s society
 

Seinfeld

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
9,542
3,585
113
Here's my position/argument:

If a young father decides to stay at home with the mother of his child, then the child will be better off and will come out better in the long term.

By deciding to stay at home, the father is accepting responsibility (at least to some degree) for the wellfare of his child and the child's mother.

Hopefully, because the child witnessed his/her mother and father staying at home and raising him/her, the child will also choose to stay at home and raise his/her children.

It might take multiple generations to get such families back into "normal" family life, but it would eventually happen.

There is no quick fix for this problem.
Especially when the lack of a father figure is not the only problem. Many don’t have a mother figure either, regardless of whether they’re physically present or not
 

Perd Hapley

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
3,465
3,714
113
Again, rats respond to incentives. People in the US aren't too dumb to respond to incentives. If it's easier to work than not, people will work. If it's easier to not work than to work, a large number of people will not work, and also engage in other socially destructive activities.

Whether people respond to incentives or not is not up for debate. The ultimate question is how do you provide the incentives?

Looking specifically at Jackson as an example. All numbers referenced are from the 2020 census.

153,701 people

23.5% are below the poverty line. That’s 36,120 people. That’s more people in Jackson - in poverty - than there are TOTAL residents in every single other city in Mississippi except Tupelo (which is about equal), Olive Branch, Biloxi, Hattiesburg, Southaven, and Gulfport. Let that sink in.

Of that 36,120, over half of them (50.6%) are working age (18-64). That’s 18,277 working age residents in poverty, which is more than the total residents than you’d find in Hernando, Laurel, Corinth, Natchez, Greenwood, and other mid-sized cities by Mississippi standards. Again…..scary.

Percentage wise, 60% of Jackson residents overall are in the 18-64 demographic overall. That’s around 92,000 people. 20.1% of those people are in poverty. The national average for ages 18-64 is 11.7%. The Mississippi statewide average is 17.6%.

So what has to be done to bring Jackson just to the national average? Well, you need to pull about 8.4% of the 18-64 demographic out of poverty. That means you need around 7,700 jobs for Jackson residents that pay something along the lines of at least $45,000-$50,000 a year or so. As stated elsewhere in the thread, that’s about where the tradeoff becomes more favorable as it relates to working vs. not working. And those jobs need to be available to workers who don’t even have a diploma or GED in many cases.

But that’s not all. 75% of the Jackson MSA lives outside of Jackson itself. So even if you assumed that Jackson residents were just as qualified as those in the suburbs for those same jobs (which would be a terrible assumption), you still need at least 4x as many jobs as people who you need to fill them, because those jobs will be hiring from the entire MSA and beyond. So, you now need over 30,000 new jobs in the MSA, all paying around that $45k ~ $50k range at minimum, and at the same time all requiring very little formal training or education. So you can quickly see its a total pipe dream to get to the national average.

So what about just getting to the Mississippi average? In other words, just getting to the statewide average of the poorest 17ing state in the country? Not a very high bar. You need 2.5% to come out of poverty. Following the same math as above, you need around 9,200 jobs to come to the Jackson MSA….each paying in that $45-$50k range. Who is bringing almost 10,000 middle class jobs like that to Jackson in its current climate? Nobody. And again, that’s whats required just to get to the average of the poorest state. Not even to excel or get to just mediocre.

That’s the scale of what it would take for productive incentives to outweigh the current ones. It truly is a death spiral situation. The number of jobs coming in of any kind is currently negative. Jobs are leaving because productive people are leaving. Tax revenue gets even lower, city gets even more unsafe, taxes raised even more to cover shortfall which raises COL even more, which causes more people to leave, and on and on. Businesses are going to continue to avoid that situation like the plague. There’s simply no way for the “incentives” to ever catch up, as far as Jackson is concerned. Other parts of the country? Maybe the jury is still out. Not sure.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Darryl Steight

Digging dog

Active member
Aug 22, 2012
3,494
133
63
Society is simply coming unwound. People have been trained not to work, mental illness is at an all time high, government handouts are out of control, people simply don't care about other people more than ever. They've learned how to game the system. Oh, and population is a major cause.
My dad always said the next Civil War will be between the haves and have-nots.

When the takers finally outnumber the providers will the the deciding time

every historical war has been tied to a hungry belly.
 

greenbean.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2012
6,115
4,680
113
The Rebublic is in a death spiral and it is not because of China, Russia, Biden, Trump, the far left, the far right or any other buzz words the dumb fricks in the media throw out. It is 100% because of how ignorant the American public has become and its only going to get worse, cause it ain't no cure for the Dumb arse and this country is eat up with it.
I say this all the time, we should be getting smarter as a society, but we're getting dumber. It's playing out just like the movie Idiocracy. I think it's because life is so easy, even for the poorest, we don't have to develop the skills of learning and figuring stuff out. Idiocracy was set 500 years in the future, I think we'll get there much quicker than that.
 

PBDog

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2021
1,033
757
113
I say this all the time, we should be getting smarter as a society, but we're getting dumber. It's playing out just like the movie Idiocracy. I think it's because life is so easy, even for the poorest, we don't have to develop the skills of learning and figuring stuff out. Idiocracy was set 500 years in the future, I think we'll get there much quicker than that.
while we fight over chicks with d*cks they spent another trillion last quarter and traded stocks to capitalize on it
 
  • Like
Reactions: CochiseCowbell

Msdeltareb

Member
Aug 26, 2014
204
76
28
COVID School lockdowns pushing kids out of classrooms did this IMO. Proliferation of crime here since 2020 is unbelievable.
It provided some steroids to the problems but Jackson started it's path down the toilet a hell of a lot longer than 4 years ago.
 

Msdeltareb

Member
Aug 26, 2014
204
76
28
I remember when Bangin’ in Little Rock came out 30 years ago on HBO. Clearly, these folks just need more social programs that will lift them out of their circumstances. **
That was high comedy. The wiggers "stackin" scene still stands out as one of the more pathetic things Ive ever seen with my own two eyes.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login