Penn State - Iowa 2023 dual thread

razpsu

Well-known member
Oct 19, 2021
7,938
10,122
113
PSU wins the TD battle, 16-2

That's hard to believe. Real Woods and Max Murin were the only Hawkeyes to get a TD.
That isn’t surprising. Iowa always looks like they are moving forward but that is how they stall. Brands figured that out a couple of years ago.

their ability to escape is superior to ours and their ability to ride is better than we are.
 

Kiwi20

New member
Oct 30, 2021
4
6
3
Brands stalled out the entire match, wrestled smart, but boring. A 1st or 2nd period stall call would have opened the match. BTW how did Warner lay on the mat for 2 plus minutes doing nothing and not get called for stalling
Brands stalled out the entire match, wrestled smart, but boring. A 1st or 2nd period stall call would have opened the match. BTW how did Warner lay on the mat for 2 plus minutes doing nothing and not get called for stalling
Agreed, Brands did nothing but block from neutral
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charles Brown

cb1994

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2022
1,285
2,602
113
Brands stalled out the entire match, wrestled smart, but boring. A 1st or 2nd period stall call would have opened the match. BTW how did Warner lay on the mat for 2 plus minutes doing nothing and not get called for stalling
My view is that Carter should be capable of getting through that on a guy like Brands especially in a meet like this. Sure it doesn’t make a different at B1Gs or NCAAs, but tonight? That would have been big.

No stalling for Warner and the stalemate call with Dean still working him were two BAD ref decisions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charles Brown

Pocono Lion

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
1,753
3,156
113
My view is that Carter should be capable of getting through that on a guy like Brands especially in a meet like this. Sure it doesn’t make a different at B1Gs or NCAAs, but tonight? That would have been big.

No stalling for Warner and the stalemate call with Dean still working him were two BAD ref decisions.
To clarify, the call when Dean was working Warner was PD, either way I thought it was a bad call.
 
  • Like
Reactions: headlock and cb1994

Charles Brown

Well-known member
Jan 5, 2022
468
809
93
My view is that Carter should be capable of getting through that on a guy like Brands especially in a meet like this. Sure it doesn’t make a different at B1Gs or NCAAs, but tonight? That would have been big.

No stalling for Warner and the stalemate call with Dean still working him were two BAD ref decisions.
Warner got comfortable on his stomach and didn't do much, should've been atleast 1 more stall call.
Carter did not show he was the superior wrestler tonight. Brands is not an all American
 
  • Like
Reactions: cb1994

Pocono Lion

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
1,753
3,156
113
Totally missed that. I’ll have to go check what went down. Didn’t seem like anything different from the first minute of the ride.
It wasn’t, everyone on the PSU side was really PO’d when he stopped it. I think If it keeps going Max gets the bow & arrow in and Warner’s crying for his momma again.
 

cb1994

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2022
1,285
2,602
113
Warner got comfortable on his stomach and didn't do much, should've been atleast 1 more stall call.
Carter did not show he was the superior wrestler tonight. Brands is not an all American
I’m with ya on all counts
 

BeaverHill

Well-known member
Sep 1, 2022
1,717
6,788
113
I guess this is what it’s like being a Bama football fan. Beat Iowa (again) and kind of have a ho-hum feeling afterwards about the dual.

Surprised it wasn’t a bigger margin of victory for PSU, but Iowa got their pucks deep in the corner and let their muckers and grinders go to work. Did I see that Iowa didn’t register a single offensive point after the match at 149? Just scintillating stuff from the Hawkeyes, way to grow the excitement Brands.
 

headlock

Member
Oct 31, 2021
78
123
33
If I heard the announcers correctly, after the 197 bout with PSU leading by 6 pts, the statement was made that Iowa needed a pin from Cassioppi to win. They further stated that the tie-breakers would start with falls and because each team had one, the next tie-breaker would be total points and Iowa had more. I didn't remember Iowa having a fall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yekrut321 and LB99

Pocono Lion

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
1,753
3,156
113
If I heard the announcers correctly, after the 197 bout with PSU leading by 6 pts, the statement was made that Iowa needed a pin from Cassioppi to win. They further stated that the tie-breakers would start with falls and because each team had one, the next tie-breaker would be total points and Iowa had more. I didn't remember Iowa having a fall.
The one fall for Iowa would have been Cassioppi’s, if it happened.
 

razpsu

Well-known member
Oct 19, 2021
7,938
10,122
113
Not mad at all at BB. Woods is serious.
Max Murin is Iowa through and through. SVN had been wrestling up til now at a level that showed he could beat Iowa. Tonight he didn’t wrestle like that.
If beau wrestled like beau at 141. Woods has a tendency to gas by the third and he just stalled with the lead. Beau will learn and wrestle him better at bigs.
 

Tom McAndrew

BWI Staff
Staff member
Oct 27, 2021
52,300
39,578
113
If I heard the announcers correctly, after the 197 bout with PSU leading by 6 pts, the statement was made that Iowa needed a pin from Cassioppi to win. They further stated that the tie-breakers would start with falls and because each team had one, the next tie-breaker would be total points and Iowa had more. I didn't remember Iowa having a fall.

so it's predicated on Cassioppi getting a win and doing so by a pin.

Here are the NCAA criteria for breaking a tie:

"a. Greater number of victories"
- they would have been tied 5-5 if Cassioppi won

"b. Combined total number of falls, forfeits, defaults and disqualifications."
- if Cassioppi had gotten a pin (the supposition), it would have been 1 fall a side (RBY for PSU, and Cassioppi for Iowa)

"c. Total match points scored only from decisions, major decisions and technical falls."
- Iowa: 5 (TF @ 125) + 3 (DEC @ 141) + 3 (DEC @ 149) + 3 (DEC @ 165) = 14
- PSU: 3 (DEC @ 157) + 3 (DEC @ 174) + 5 (TF @ 184) + 3 (DEC @ 197) = 14

"d. Total near fall points scored only from decisions, major decisions and technical falls. (Example: N-2 + N-2 + N-4 = Total of 8 near fall points scored for one team.)"
- Iowa: N-4 + N-4 + N-4 + N-4 = 16 (all from Spencer Lee)
- PSU: N-4 = 4 (from Aaron Brooks)

I thought they said that it was going to be decided on total match points (the 3rd criteria), but if my math above is correct, it would have been decided on total fall points (excluding pins), the 4th criteria.
 

Chris92

Well-known member
Oct 14, 2021
844
2,252
93
thought they said that it was going to be decided on total match points (the 3rd criteria), but if my math above is correct, it would have been decided on total fall points (excluding pins), the 4th criteria.
I believe with criteria C, it's total match points scored by each wrestler, not team points.
 

BruceK-PSU83

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2021
980
1,245
93
I believe with criteria C, it's total match points scored by each wrestler, not team points.
Believe this is correct. The third criterion is the total of individual match points, neglecting the points scored in any bout won by pin.

125: Iowa 18, PSU 2
133: pin
141: Iowa 4, PSU 1
149: Iowa 4, PSU 1
157: Iowa 2, PSU 3
165: Iowa 2, PSU 1
174: Iowa 1, PSU 2
184: Iowa 7, PSU 22
197: Iowa 0, PSU 2
285: pin (hypothetical)

Total: Iowa 38, PSU 34
 

WV lion

Well-known member
Oct 17, 2021
772
822
93
If I heard the announcers correctly, after the 197 bout with PSU leading by 6 pts, the statement was made that Iowa needed a pin from Cassioppi to win. They further stated that the tie-breakers would start with falls and because each team had one, the next tie-breaker would be total points and Iowa had more. I didn't remember Iowa having a fall.
It would have been Cass
 

J.E.B

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2021
1,676
2,240
113
Believe this is correct. The third criterion is the total of individual match points, neglecting the points scored in any bout won by pin.

125:
133:
141: Iowa 4, PSU 1
149: Iowa 4, PSU 1
157: Iowa 2, PSU 3
165: Iowa 2, PSU 1
174: Iowa 1, PSU 2
184:
197: Iowa 0, PSU 2
285: Iowa 1, PSU 4

Total: Iowa (3) 14, PSU (4) 14
Take away 125, 133, 184 and that’s just a grinder for 50 minutes. Not a lot of excitement in that. But it was #1 vs. #2! The highlight of the night was definitely Vespa cradling Lee. That was unbelievable in the first 10 seconds. The rest of the match was like watching Woody vs. Bo matchups.
 

watoos

Active member
Oct 31, 2021
390
484
63
Brands was yelling tie up the head. We gotta stay out of their ties and attack with ANGLES.
You absolutely nailed it. Iowa kids tied up the head, it appeared to be their strategy. Almost every Iowa kid did it.
The Brands teach their style and Cael allows his kids to use their style and makes it better. Iowa's strategy worked pretty well, they slowed the pace down.
 

Superdave63

Member
Oct 31, 2021
143
183
43
SIAP - Why Vespa at 125 over Steen? Was Cael thinking he would be less likely to get pinned?

What happened to Assad @ 182 for Iown?
 

Spinpsu

Well-known member
Dec 1, 2022
1,644
1,572
113
You absolutely nailed it. Iowa kids tied up the head, it appeared to be their strategy. Almost every Iowa kid did it.
The Brands teach their style and Cael allows his kids to use their style and makes it better. Iowa's strategy worked pretty well, they slowed the pace down.
Yep. If I’m an elite wrestler no way in heck would I ever want to wrestle at Iowa. I love our style much better.
 

razpsu

Well-known member
Oct 19, 2021
7,938
10,122
113
Believe this is correct. The third criterion is the total of individual match points, neglecting the points scored in any bout won by pin.

125: Iowa 18, PSU 2
133: pin
141: Iowa 4, PSU 1
149: Iowa 4, PSU 1
157: Iowa 2, PSU 3
165: Iowa 2, PSU 1
174: Iowa 1, PSU 2
184: Iowa 7, PSU 22
197: Iowa 0, PSU 2
285: pin (hypothetical)

Total: Iowa 38, PSU 34
That is why brands did a great job with starocci.
 

Bwifan

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,509
2,744
113
Think I will stay right here on this board. Made the mistake of going over to the Iowa board and it's nothing but PSU wrestlers are on steroids and PSU only won because of the homer ref calls. Yeesh.... Thank You everyone having great input about the actual match.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Tryingtodoitright

Sunshinedynomite 1

Active member
Oct 14, 2021
344
321
63
Their backups are in a tournament this weekend I believe. I poised the question though why not Rhoades @ 74 and bump Brands up to 84
 

pabison

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2021
452
886
93
If I heard the announcers correctly, after the 197 bout with PSU leading by 6 pts, the statement was made that Iowa needed a pin from Cassioppi to win. They further stated that the tie-breakers would start with falls and because each team had one, the next tie-breaker would be total points and Iowa had more. I didn't remember Iowa having a fall.
In that scenario they would have had a fall if Cassioppi pinned Kerk. That’s the fall they were talking about. It was some serious dreamer mentality, but they’re announcers and they’re paid to create whatever drama they can to keep it interesting.
 

LB99

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2021
6,253
8,226
113
Well, Murin surprised me. I didn’t think he would beat SVN, but SVN had no offense. Outside of that, it went about as I expected. Facundo is right there with all the top guys. He will get better and be in line for a good finish in March.
 

LB99

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2021
6,253
8,226
113
Haines is for real and will make some noise at 157. Kid never looks overwhelmed or uncomfortable. Cael does a fantastic job of finding kids with this perspective.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login