Got me in your sights? Hey, he wanted to go down that path and gave a myopic analysis of the landscape just to support his view on a divisive topic. I responded in a way to discourage him from going places most people don’t want to go here.So if I've been following along correctly; One poster decides to go in the gutter and insult another poster, that poster responds by using facts and logic to support his stance on said topic, then you decide to ignore the person throwing out insults and instead chide the person defending his position?
So he should've just let the other person insult him in your view and not defend himself?
You're part of the problem, do better.
He wants to self-police Walmart and churches. I want to see us self-police this board. Which is more relevant?