That SEC Shorts taping at the Grant Presidential Library…

Dawgbite

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2011
6,367
4,974
113
I’ve often wondered how long slavery would have survived if allowed to die a natural death. How different would race relations have been in the 20th century without the civil war being treated like some kind of martyr.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LocalBeachBum

FormerBully

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2022
1,471
2,261
113
I disagree about it being un-winnable from the start. It was very winnable for the south until July of 1863. The simultaneous defeat at Gettysburg and Vicksburg was the tip of the bell curve for the south in the war.

Lee’s aggressiveness and feeling of invincibility were assets in Virginia but liabilities in Pennsylvania. If Lee had listened to Jeb Stuart and have been happy with pinning the Union army on those hills in Gettysburg while opening the path directly to Washington…. Who knows. Lee could have turned toward Washington and the chase would have been on. And then if he inevitably clashed on ground more favorable to him close to Washington… again…. Who knows.

The war was not un-winnable if two or three changes could have been made and the outcome have been totally different.
One of Lee's and the south's biggest mistake was their desire for sweeping historic battle victories. If you look at the percentage of men lost Lee does not rank favorably. They were unable to adapt to changing warfare and that is why I think Grant is the better general.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maroon Eagle

HailStout

Well-known member
Jan 4, 2020
2,583
6,354
113
The union Could have ended the war earlier if Grant had been in charge from the start. It is well documented how frustrated Lincoln was with his initial generals. I believe he went through three top generals before finally landing on Grant. The main issue was the fact that they weren’t willing to do what was necessary to end the war because they were afraid of the cost of human life. Because of this more lives were lost.
 

Walkthedawg

Well-known member
Oct 3, 2022
492
833
93
The union Could have ended the war earlier if Grant had been in charge from the start. It is well documented how frustrated Lincoln was with his initial generals. I believe he went through three top generals before finally landing on Grant. The main issue was the fact that they weren’t willing to do what was necessary to end the war because they were afraid of the cost of human life. Because of this more lives were lost.
If the south and the north had swapped generals before the first Bull Run, the war would probably been over in 6 months. The Union had a bunch of bureaucrats masquerading as war command until Grant. The south had warfighters from the start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HailStout

LocalBeachBum

Member
Dec 8, 2021
362
249
43
Lincoln invaded the south to preserve the tariff revenues from the southern ports. The south was going to undercut the north tariffs by 10%.

/stuff they don’t teach in history anymore
 
Jan 31, 2012
490
28
28
It would be nice for Keenum to use his political influence to lobby for a "grant" to build proper presidential library that is also a mini civil war museum. Build it somewhere that folks could easily get to it and tour it, preferably near the Hunter Henry Abomination, I mean Center. Something to draw people in and another thing to do with kids/visitors on game day. We need attractions.

You're pretty close. In the lot on the corner of Russell and Hwy 12.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login