is it just that the recruiting sites are just now interviewing these guys? or is our staff FINALLY trying to find a few OLs for this class?
by the way since we are not in on many blue chip OLs, I like that we are going for tall, athletic, "underweight" guys. That way we can potentially beef them up with that "good weight" jargon in 2-3 years.
This seems in direct opposition to our previous theory on low-rated lineman, which was to bring in a slow fatass in the hopes you can decrease his fatassedness and hope that athleticism will magically appear (not too mention, good pad level).
P.S. anyone know where i can learn to improve my sentence structure?
by the way since we are not in on many blue chip OLs, I like that we are going for tall, athletic, "underweight" guys. That way we can potentially beef them up with that "good weight" jargon in 2-3 years.
This seems in direct opposition to our previous theory on low-rated lineman, which was to bring in a slow fatass in the hopes you can decrease his fatassedness and hope that athleticism will magically appear (not too mention, good pad level).
P.S. anyone know where i can learn to improve my sentence structure?