Please don't be a jerk and get it locked. I am just curious. For me, Machin of West Virginia would be the only close one, even though I still don't think I would cross over. I am generally curious about the rest of you.
So we're being told.Kamala Harris. She is very intelligent.
I would give Andy Beshear serious consideration if they put him at the top of the ticket and left cackling b!+ch where she is.Please don't be a jerk and get it locked. I am just curious. For me, Machin of West Virginia would be the only close one, even though I still don't think I would cross over. I am generally curious about the rest of you.
Damn you must be a liberal.I wrote in Ronald Reagan's name last time. I may do so again.
This is a completely reasonable way to vote - who the President is and whether they are likable is far less important than the myriad of folks who make up their Administrations.For me it wouldn't be who as much as what their policies would be. I hadn't vote for "who" since W's first term and that sucks.
I had to laugh when I got accused of being a liberal back during COVID. I'm a Reagan Republican. That looks like it leaves me without a party at the moment.Damn you must be a liberal.
So, a Gen Xer?First quality - younger than 60. Preferably someone on the millennial line.
If anyone is to vote based on their conscience, then you cannot vote for either of the 2 parties we have been offered lately. Vote Libertarian just out of pure spite for the system we have in place, its great. Maybe in 200 years it will make a difference lol.Well, if either party would give us a good candidate to vote for, it would be a start. It's been a long time.
That's exactly what I've done the past 2 presidential elections. Not sure what I'll do this November.If anyone is to vote based on their conscience, then you cannot vote for either of the 2 parties we have been offered lately. Vote Libertarian just out of pure spite for the system we have in place, its great. Maybe in 200 years it will make a difference lol.
I had to laugh when I got accused of being a liberal back during COVID. I'm a Reagan Republican. That looks like it leaves me without a party at the moment.
At the national level, someone with a demonstrated record of an economic populist record, or any other position that would actually improve a significant national issue (immigration, welfare society, etc). Making me believe they would actually implement it rather than just talk about it (see, The Wall) would be a high bar.Please don't be a jerk and get it locked. I am just curious. For me, Machin of West Virginia would be the only close one, even though I still don't think I would cross over. I am generally curious about the rest of you.
I'd be more than happy if we had more viable parties in America, but Libertarians just simply are not serious people. They're like house cats: convinced they survive off their cunning and fierce independence, but actually fully dependent on a system they neither appreciate nor understand.If anyone is to vote based on their conscience, then you cannot vote for either of the 2 parties we have been offered lately. Vote Libertarian just out of pure spite for the system we have in place, its great. Maybe in 200 years it will make a difference lol.
Yes, I think I have the covid, so not cpelling good. Not that I did that great in the first place.You mean Manchin?
Interestingly, Joe Manchin did more to thwart Democrat pork spending than Mitch McConnell ever did.
TulsI Gabbard has my vote, if you know what I mean
Interestingly, I looked at Kamalas record today, and one of the few things she is known for is (as AG of Cali) for dropping charges against first time, non-violent offenders that completed job training. Teach a man to fish....I'm not voting for anybody that doesn't have a pro-growth platform that gives people the best opportunity to lift themselves outta poverty. Teach a man to fish instead of giving him a fish I say. Growing the pie instead of only being obsessed with how it's sliced and divided up. Meritocracy and healthy competition is the way. Even though I'm pro bidness, these mergers are starting to concern me. Less choices for bare necessities is not good. I heard Trump mention it a while back but nothing since. Is anti-trust law still on the books?
She's not going to date you, dude. Well, then again...Kamala Harris. She is very intelligent.
In theoryI'm not voting for anybody that doesn't have a pro-growth platform that gives people the best opportunity to lift themselves outta poverty. Teach a man to fish instead of giving him a fish I say. Growing the pie instead of only being obsessed with how it's sliced and divided up. Meritocracy and healthy competition is the way. Even though I'm pro bidness, these mergers are starting to concern me. Less choices for bare necessities is not good. I heard Trump mention it a while back but nothing since. Is anti-trust law still on the books?
we desperately need ranked choice voting. term limits would be a real nice to have as well.If anyone is to vote based on their conscience, then you cannot vote for either of the 2 parties we have been offered lately. Vote Libertarian just out of pure spite for the system we have in place, its great. Maybe in 200 years it will make a difference lol.
I was hoping this one will be different where State fans are not screaming at each other and challenging a fight at sonic parking lot.I’m amazed at how much you guys like to talk about this ****… hell I get there ain’t much in the way of sports going on right but do you guys apparently never get tired of a political thread.