Interesting thread, confirming that many of us are thinking a lot of the same things.
Perhaps the most confusing aspect of Saturday’s game (non-2pc division) is how we’d run a lot on first down, gain yards… then move away from the run. This was pointed out by a number of analysts as well as Michigan fans who admitted they didn’t understand why Penn State didn’t stick with their running game as it appeared to be effective.
Something I had been wondering (and which Franklin alluded to several times) was whether there had been conversations with MY earlier in the season (following Illinois, following OSU, following Indiana) where JF had expressed displeasure with the lack of consistency on offense.
It’s possible that Yurcich’s firing, while seemingly abrupt to all of us, had been on the table for a while. Yurcich, after all, was the one who personally recruited Drew Allar, and then to see Allar develop so — let’s say “slowly” — this season has to be, at a minimum, frustrating for a head coach. This was the kid you wanted. You went out and got him. And now he’s here and you’re not able to do anything with him!
From an observational standpoint, it was obvious to me that there were MAJOR issues as early as the Illinois game; issues that I saw as being systemic, not easily remedied, and would likely plague us throughout the season barring some sort of miracle. That assessment proved to be correct, and it’s not inconceivable that JF felt the same way.
Also, I never buy into the narrative that we’re deliberately playing conservative so as not to tip our hand to tougher opponents. That’s total BS. If your offensive schemes are conservative, or directionless, or overly reliant on gimmicks, it’s because that’s your style as a coach, not because you’re trying to play 4D chess against Ryan Day.
TL;DR — JF might have put MY on notice several times after poor offensive performances, but we simply weren’t told.