2024-2025 WBB Team (2022-present)

CockyGirl

Joined Oct 13, 2015 • Garnet Trust Supporter
Jan 31, 2022
1,546
4,869
113
Unusually emotional press conference from UCLA's coach yesterday. Makes me think something is going on with Lauren Betts, who didn't play this weekend.


I watched as well. It does seem something is going on with Betts. In my opinion it is non basketball related as the coach said there are more important things than basketball. The way that Kiki had to take over for the coach at a point bc she was so emotional was telling as well. Kiki said it has been a rough week for the team and that they miss Betts presence on and off the court. I hope its nothing too serious!
 

USCEDGE

Joined Mar 5, 2019
Feb 5, 2022
796
1,454
93
Someone in a UCLA forum suggested it was cramps from having her period. Always amazes me how dumb people can really be. I'm hoping for the best but feeling like this is not good. Prayers for the young lady....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sis_aac9

KingWard

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
6,887
7,219
113
Someone in a UCLA forum suggested it was cramps from having her period. Always amazes me how dumb people can really be. I'm hoping for the best but feeling like this is not good. Prayers for the young lady....
The coach was visibly upset, almost torn up. There's something more serious afoot than menstrual cramps, not that I am minimizing those.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USCEDGE

DarkCock

Joined Jan 21, 2006
Jan 30, 2022
4,124
10,861
113
She was on Haley Jones' podcast 5 days ago and she appeared to be doing fine. 🤷‍♂️

 

KingWard

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
6,887
7,219
113
Incidentally, I was watching highlights of the UCLA/Washington St. game. The attendance was abysmal, pathetic, and I daresay, pitiful.
 

Prestonyte

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
5,261
5,214
113
LSU Women's BB wins an NCAA title and loses close to $8 million last year.
Is the Lady Gamecocks program in the red or black financially?

 

adcoop

Well-known member
Jul 3, 2023
900
1,050
93
LSU Women's BB wins an NCAA title and loses close to $8 million last year.
Is the Lady Gamecocks program in the red or black financially?

We were in the red as well between 3-4 million dollars last year. Personally, I think we should go up on the ticket prices. People will pay it. Further, I think the staffs for Women's Basketball are too large. Does Dawn really need 4 Assistant Coaches. Some of that support staff could be shaved back as well. The last think I will say is that the Women's Game is getting exploited by ESPN and other networks. They laud Thursday ratings being higher than the NBA. However, when it's time to negotiate a TV contract, the women are not even getting a penny on the dollar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sis_aac9

Sharris

Joined Mar 22, 2016
Jan 31, 2022
186
526
93
We were in the red as well between 3-4 million dollars last year. Personally, I think we should go up on the ticket prices. People will pay it. Further, I think the staffs for Women's Basketball are too large. Does Dawn really need 4 Assistant Coaches. Some of that support staff could be shaved back as well. The last think I will say is that the Women's Game is getting exploited by ESPN and other networks. They laud Thursday ratings being higher than the NBA. However, when it's time to negotiate a TV contract, the women are not even getting a penny on the dollar.
I disagree with any downgrading of staff for Dawn as here staff matches the staff of everyother serious womens program in the country. The question you should ask yourself is how much money the Baseball, Track, Soccer program etc.. loses. It is similar to womens programs. As you can see is that our program losses less because of their drawing power than years ago when we were losing 9 million. The biggest difference is the TV contracts which will change with the new deal that ESPN signed exclusively with non-revenue sports and the Units funding that teams in the NCAA tournament will hopefully get in the future.
 

adcoop

Well-known member
Jul 3, 2023
900
1,050
93
I disagree with any downgrading of staff for Dawn as here staff matches the staff of everyother serious womens program in the country. The question you should ask yourself is how much money the Baseball, Track, Soccer program etc.. loses. It is similar to womens programs. As you can see is that our program losses less because of their drawing power than years ago when we were losing 9 million. The biggest difference is the TV contracts which will change with the new deal that ESPN signed exclusively with non-revenue sports and the Units funding that teams in the NCAA tournament will hopefully get in the future.
I am aware that all other programs lose money besides the football team. I just think the Women's Basketball program doesn't have to. We can increase our Revenue and tighten our belt. I am with you on the TV contracts. The money that the women's side is getting on these TV contracts is beyond pitiful for the exposure they are getting. No game in college basketball, men's or ladies, was as hyped as South Carolina vs. LSU. The viewership followed. However, the programs are not receiving the benefit right now. It's unfortunate.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: YankeeRooster

DarkCock

Joined Jan 21, 2006
Jan 30, 2022
4,124
10,861
113
The picks for today and Monday
I was 4-0 on Thursday but other than our game they were all mismatches. Today’s and tomorrow’s games are going either muddy up or clarify the race for the double byes.

Gamecocks✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️ vs Vandy

see above

A&M✔️ @ UF
A&M is the better TEAM but Correa and Martharu might be the two best players on the court. I believe UF gets 6’6” Kyle back today I think. Even though it’s in Gainesville I’m picking A&M.

UT ✔️@ OM
Possibly best game of the day. Winner has a big leg up on 3rd place. I just am not impressed by UT but they keep winning. Coach Yo called out the fan base for lack of support this week. Attendance today will be a litmus test about whether Yo stays. I want to pick OM…..but UT has just a little more

Ark @ Mizzou✔️
🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️Who knows? Does good or bad Arky show up? Does good or bad Mizzou show up? Tossing the coin 🪙….. It’s tails Mizzou wins.

UK vs Bama✔️
Nobody thought UK would have 2 wins at this point. They are that bad. Nobody thought Bama would have only 2 wins. Disappointing. Bama gets back on track


Monday
UGA @ Aub✔️
UGA Preseason pick to make the NCAAs. Auburn was picked next to last. Auburn is improving UGA is not.

LSU✔️ @ MISS ST
VERY INTRIGUING. LSU needs a bounce back performance. STATE needs a big win to be in the top 4 in the conference race. Need it also for NCAA hopes. I said I would pick against LSU all season on gener principles But LSU wins
If Auburn can beat LSU, I suppose Mississippi State could also. The game is worth watching just to see HVL guard Lauren Park-Lane. Or will Mulkey mix things up?

Jessika Carter is one of the nicest players in the conference. I'm worried she's too nice. She needs a little mean streak in her tonight. If she can stay out of foul trouble and Angel Reese doesn't, then the Bulldogs have a real chance. But I fear it's going to be the other way around.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Goody

winloseortie

Joined Feb 21, 2007
Feb 2, 2022
5,510
20,815
113
If Auburn can beat LSU, then I suppose Mississippi State could as well.

If Auburn can beat LSU, I suppose Mississippi State could also. The game is worth watching just to see HVL guard Lauren Park-Lane. Or will Mulkey mix things up?

Jessika Carter is one of the nicest players in the conference. I'm worried she's too nice. She needs a little mean streak in her tonight. If she can stay out of foul trouble and Angel Reese doesn't, then the Bulldogs have a real chance. But I fear it's going to be the other way around.
I got the popcorn ready😊😊

This has been my worst picking of the season. Past us and LSU there is just not a team that is reliable night in and night out.
 

Goody

Joined Apr 14, 2017
Jan 30, 2022
769
943
93
LSU Women's BB wins an NCAA title and loses close to $8 million last year.
Is the Lady Gamecocks program in the red or black financially?

That’s what happens when you pay some of your players over 1 million a year. They offered Joyce Edwards over a 1 million package!! At one time our girls were getting $25 k a season. Don’t know if it has increased any!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sis_aac9

CockyGirl

Joined Oct 13, 2015 • Garnet Trust Supporter
Jan 31, 2022
1,546
4,869
113
Spot on from an LSU poster …


Well Kim fumbled the ball this year from the get go with her roster construction. I knew playing only 5 players every week was not sustainable.

-LSU lost Ladazhia Williams, who is 6'4. We add 6'1 Morrow
-LSU lost Alexis Morris, who is a PG, we add HVL who is NOT a ball handler
-LSU sits on 3 open scholarships going into the season despite having needs beyond what the transfers brought
-LSU did not attempt to develop its bench much during the OOC slate and kept starters in up 40+ late into the 4th quarter
-Kim over delegated recruiting responsibilities and signed her worst HS class in 12+ years

LSU is in deep trouble in the near future with Reese leaving if Kim doesn't adjust some things from her staff to what is going on in recruiting/roster construction. It was pure laziness this year
 

Deleted11512

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2023
4,985
3,954
113
That’s what happens when you pay some of your players over 1 million a year. They offered Joyce Edwards over a 1 million package!! At one time our girls were getting $25 k a season. Don’t know if it has increased any!!!
That has nothing to do with AD money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YankeeRooster

KingWard

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
6,887
7,219
113
The more they keep losing, the more they will disintegrate as a team. The more they disintegrate, the harder it will be to recruit and rebuild. (except for their grand stash of wealth) Which suits me just fine.
You underestimate the Dime Store Queen, which is surprising. They're going to be good as long as she's there. It's our job to be better. Just think of the lift our program got this past week by beating him under those particular circumstances. Had we played and beat them AFTER this game tonight, the impact would have been greatly diminished.
 

The Coast is Clear

Joined Nov 27, 2019 • Garnet Trust Supporter
Jan 25, 2022
7,359
12,595
113
You underestimate the Dime Store Queen, which is surprising. They're going to be good as long as she's there. It's our job to be better. Just think of the lift our program got this past week by beating him under those particular circumstances. Had we played and beat them AFTER this game tonight, the impact would have been greatly diminished.
IMHO, LSU would not have lost this game tonight but for having already played and lost to the Gamecocks four days ago.

Lots of respect for Mulkey's history and coaching ability, but that star seems to be starting to flicker a little.

It IS our job to be better. We have been. I think that will continue under Dawn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cockyclt

YankeeRooster

Active member
Nov 29, 2022
176
350
63
The picks for today and Monday
I was 4-0 on Thursday but other than our game they were all mismatches. Today’s and tomorrow’s games are going either muddy up or clarify the race for the double byes.

Gamecocks✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️ vs Vandy

see above

A&M✔️ @ UF
A&M is the better TEAM but Correa and Martharu might be the two best players on the court. I believe UF gets 6’6” Kyle back today I think. Even though it’s in Gainesville I’m picking A&M.

UT ✔️@ OM
Possibly best game of the day. Winner has a big leg up on 3rd place. I just am not impressed by UT but they keep winning. Coach Yo called out the fan base for lack of support this week. Attendance today will be a litmus test about whether Yo stays. I want to pick OM…..but UT has just a little more

Ark @ Mizzou✔️
🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️Who knows? Does good or bad Arky show up? Does good or bad Mizzou show up? Tossing the coin 🪙….. It’s tails Mizzou wins.

UK vs Bama✔️
Nobody thought UK would have 2 wins at this point. They are that bad. Nobody thought Bama would have only 2 wins. Disappointing. Bama gets back on track


Monday
UGA @ Aub✔️
UGA Preseason pick to make the NCAAs. Auburn was picked next to last. Auburn is improving UGA is not.

LSU✔️ @ MISS ST
VERY INTRIGUING. LSU needs a bounce back performance. STATE needs a big win to be in the top 4 in the conference race. Need it also for NCAA hopes. I said I would pick against LSU all season on gener principles But LSU wins
Hope you didn’t place any bets……
 

adcoop

Well-known member
Jul 3, 2023
900
1,050
93
I'd rather they had won and kept winning until and unless we play them again.
Not worried about LSU. I think we took their best punch in a hostile environment. Cardoso struggled in the first half. Paopao didn't make shots until a crucial one at the end. I think we take them by double digits on a neutral court. Still more concerned about a team like Iowa where one person can put so much stress on our man defense that it puts pressure on us to score. More equipped to put up points this year but still cause for concern. Also, Stanford is quietly getting better and their size always give teams problems. I don't know much about Colorado or Kansas State, but I intend to take a look at them soon.
 

The Coast is Clear

Joined Nov 27, 2019 • Garnet Trust Supporter
Jan 25, 2022
7,359
12,595
113
Just took a look at Auburn who we play on Thursday. How did LSU lose to them? Auburn doesn't score much. 67 points per game. 40% FG and in the 28% on three pointers. It has one player averaging 16 a game, two others at 8 and 9, then drop to 6 and below. For the season they are outrebounding opponents by 1. The only things that stand out are +6 in turnover margin and opponents averaging just 55 pts/game. Conservatively, we win by 20 on the road? 79-59?
 

winloseortie

Joined Feb 21, 2007
Feb 2, 2022
5,510
20,815
113
Just took a look at Auburn who we play on Thursday. How did LSU lose to them? Auburn doesn't score much. 67 points per game. 40% FG and in the 28% on three pointers. It has one player averaging 16 a game, two others at 8 and 9, then drop to 6 and below. For the season they are outrebounding opponents by 1. The only things that stand out are +6 in turnover margin and opponents averaging just 55 pts/game. Conservatively, we win by 20 on the road? 79-59?
Auburn beat LSU because of several reasons….Some of their doing and some that LSU self inflicted
1. Auburn dictated tempo
2. Played good tough D
3. Fought LSU to a draw on the boards
4. HVL & Williams were 4-19
5. LSU’s guards are wretched on D
6. LSU does not know how to handle being in a close game

Auburn is well coached but I too think it’s a 20 point game. I don’t think it’s a name your margin game like the Kentucky game.

I am always interested and a little perturbed by our rebounding
 

The Coast is Clear

Joined Nov 27, 2019 • Garnet Trust Supporter
Jan 25, 2022
7,359
12,595
113
Auburn beat LSU because of several reasons….Some of their doing and some that LSU self inflicted
1. Auburn dictated tempo
2. Played good tough D
3. Fought LSU to a draw on the boards
4. HVL & Williams were 4-19
5. LSU’s guards are wretched on D
6. LSU does not know how to handle being in a close game

Auburn is well coached but I too think it’s a 20 point game. I don’t think it’s a name your margin game like the Kentucky game.

I am always interested and a little perturbed by our rebounding
Methinks #6 on your list might be the most important. And they are too tired to execute by the end of the game.

I had a business colleague who made fun of me for years for saying I was perturbed about something. Just returning the favor. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
  • Like
Reactions: winloseortie

KingWard

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
6,887
7,219
113
IMHO, LSU would not have lost this game tonight but for having already played and lost to the Gamecocks four days ago.

Lots of respect for Mulkey's history and coaching ability, but that star seems to be starting to flicker a little.

It IS our job to be better. We have been. I think that will continue under Dawn.
I would agree that losing to us might have softened them up. As for the future prospects of the two programs, that picture will have to take shape as we go along.
Not worried about LSU. I think we took their best punch in a hostile environment. Cardoso struggled in the first half. Paopao didn't make shots until a crucial one at the end. I think we take them by double digits on a neutral court. Still more concerned about a team like Iowa where one person can put so much stress on our man defense that it puts pressure on us to score. More equipped to put up points this year but still cause for concern. Also, Stanford is quietly getting better and their size always give teams problems. I don't know much about Colorado or Kansas State, but I intend to take a look at them soon.
I'm less "concerned" about LSU after last night. No disrespect to Miss. State but that was a bad loss last night.

Actually, the SEC is becoming the loser in terms of the rankings. I see only two teams in the Top 25 and now only one of them will be in the Top 10. This league used to have some oomph.

I realize that's not the most important thing from our perspective, but in terms of our conference, it's embarrassing.
 

DarkCock

Joined Jan 21, 2006
Jan 30, 2022
4,124
10,861
113
Spot on from an LSU poster …


Well Kim fumbled the ball this year from the get go with her roster construction. I knew playing only 5 players every week was not sustainable.

-LSU lost Ladazhia Williams, who is 6'4. We add 6'1 Morrow
-LSU lost Alexis Morris, who is a PG, we add HVL who is NOT a ball handler
-LSU sits on 3 open scholarships going into the season despite having needs beyond what the transfers brought
-LSU did not attempt to develop its bench much during the OOC slate and kept starters in up 40+ late into the 4th quarter
-Kim over delegated recruiting responsibilities and signed her worst HS class in 12+ years

LSU is in deep trouble in the near future with Reese leaving if Kim doesn't adjust some things from her staff to what is going on in recruiting/roster construction. It was pure laziness this year
Solid points. I think the poster should have recognized how difficult it is to win in a hostile environment as well. Last year LSU only played one road game in front of a substantial crowd, in Columbia, and we know how that ended. They were not a big draw on the road. It wasn't until the championship game and Reese's antics that they became a "thing." Of course, we then have Reese and Flau'jae all over the media in the offseason. Then the transfers and the assembling of the dream team. They came into the season and asked for the smoke and they are getting it on the road. It's not easy to win in sold-out arenas, and Mulkey did nothing in her OCC scheduling to prepare her team for those kinds of games. And here we are...two SEC road losses to bubble teams.

All their SEC losses have been close. I don't think the weak OCC helped prepare them for end-game situations in conference play. But if she insists on playing those games, why not at least give her bench some experience? To be fair, Smith's injury and Poole's dismissal were huge losses. I don't know...the bench might be beyond salvaging at this point. I might start Pao and sub HVL in just to get something from the bench.
 

DarkCock

Joined Jan 21, 2006
Jan 30, 2022
4,124
10,861
113
I would agree that losing to us might have softened them up. As for the future prospects of the two programs, that picture will have to take shape as we go along.

I'm less "concerned" about LSU after last night. No disrespect to Miss. State but that was a bad loss last night.

Actually, the SEC is becoming the loser in terms of the rankings. I see only two teams in the Top 25 and now only one of them will be in the Top 10. This league used to have some oomph.

I realize that's not the most important thing from our perspective, but in terms of our conference, it's embarrassing.
There goes KingWard being hyperbolic again. The SEC is 3rd in the NET, ahead of the ACC & the Big Ten. Charlie Creme has 8 SEC teams in the tournament (tied with the PAC-12) and two teams in his "Next Four Out." The conference also claims the last two national champions who just played a game in front of a huge television audience. The conference is not "embarrassing." C'mon, dog.
 

DarkCock

Joined Jan 21, 2006
Jan 30, 2022
4,124
10,861
113
Not worried about LSU. I think we took their best punch in a hostile environment. Cardoso struggled in the first half. Paopao didn't make shots until a crucial one at the end. I think we take them by double digits on a neutral court. Still more concerned about a team like Iowa where one person can put so much stress on our man defense that it puts pressure on us to score. More equipped to put up points this year but still cause for concern. Also, Stanford is quietly getting better and their size always give teams problems. I don't know much about Colorado or Kansas State, but I intend to take a look at them soon.
Cardoso did not struggle in the 1st half. We struggled WITHOUT HER on the court in the 1st half. Rewatch the game if you doubt me.

And she should not be "co" Player of the Week with anyone, but at least she was recognized.

 

winloseortie

Joined Feb 21, 2007
Feb 2, 2022
5,510
20,815
113
There goes KingWard being hyperbolic again. The SEC is 3rd in the NET, ahead of the ACC & the Big Ten. Charlie Creme has 8 SEC teams in the tournament (tied with the PAC-12) and two teams in his "Next Four Out." The conference also claims the last two national champions who just played a game in front of a huge television audience. The conference is not "embarrassing." C'mon, dog.
Hyperbolic, a little. However look at the seeding
1,4,7,7,9,11,11,12. Very easily Gamecocks could be the only SEC team to make the second weekend.