@marshall23 My post on Premium from yesterday:
ApexLion said:
Here's another kicker for consideration. Maybe our own
@NateBauer would like to consider the implications of the following and share a take:
What if this thing keeps snowballing into next week and more info comes out... does Kraft dare to question the validity of the game between PSU and UM? In other words, can a member of the conference postpone a game due to extraneous circumstances? I have to think there are 'act of god' provisions in the conference contract as well a means to petition the conference. If you are sure the game is compromised in some way, why play?
Put simply, could Kraft say 'we aren't playing Michigan now.'?
Before you brush aside the notion during your busy week, think about the issue in its totality. You are essentially party to a fraud if you play. Additionally, millions of dollars could hang in the balance depending on the outcome as bowl slotting will be affected. As a business person and steward of the university, is Kraft not obligated to consider the implications of playing vs. not playing such a game?
BTW, this is very similar to the BC point shaving scandal which nearly wrecked NCAA basketball but some level heads worked quickly and intelligently to investigate, working with the FBI to get to the facts. Before the Internet, people saw things and couldn't figure out why games ended the way they did. Eventually, some witnesses came forward. Guess Pettiti wasn't alive back then.