You have no idea and neither so I about WHAT INFO WAS GIVEN TO THE GRAND JURY. I don’t care for deshaun, but I’m not blind and or stupid either. If it looks like a turd, smells like a turd, I don’t have to taste it to come to a conclusion that it’s a turd.
Ok so what do you think Watson gets???
- Thread starter York cock
- Start date
not true. You need to at least try and find info before spouting off about it.
https://www.nfl.com/_amp/second-tex...-indict-browns-qb-deshaun-watson-on-criminal-
just because you don’t know things doesn’t mean the rest of us are in the same boat
Again, the women's testimony is not factual evidence, it's testimony.
And I googled watsons "admission texts" and found:
"Sorry about you feeling uncomfortable," Watson wrote, as seen in a screenshot provided by her lawyers. "Never were the intentions. Lmk if you want to work in the future. My apologies."
I think this is less of a smoking gun than you believe, unless you are referring to different texts?
I do agree with your amusement at people clinging to a sinking ship though.
You are ignorant and I choose to end our conversation about this matter.
This is odd. In post #95 of this thread, you seemed pretty certain of what the DA gave the grand jury when you accused the DA of tanking the case on purpose because it was (your words) a he said/she said and unwinnable.
It is interesting that he said/ she said, unprovable case is now absolutely a matter of certainty to you as well.
But what you can do… when you look at yourself in the mirror, just know you were woefully wrong about this, you were and are ignorant on the process and facts, and the facts are undisputed. You will look at your past posts and look pretty stupid indeed. Then you can look what I’ve said since day one and then see I’m a little more informed than you are, and if you watch any tv and you can read at least on a 9th grade level you would see that america thinks the way I do. But, have at it chief
Name calling when presented with facts is not the way to convince people you're right, imo.
But I see you've reached that point. Have a good day.
On the DA THAT WAS MY opinion on what supposedly went down. I agree with Mike florio that it seems plausible that’s what she did. I said it was inwinnable in a criminal court, not civil cases. Are you slow or something? I bet you are glad school is about to start huh??? Did you get a chance to go school shopping with mommy yet?
Feels pretty good when I see you have conceited than I’m right, justice will be served on deshaun, and you will look at your posts and realize you have no clue
You probably mean conceded, and I most certainly have not.
Tell some more mom jokes, that works.
Have a nice day.
Given the degradation of responses, I'm willing to say you put the final nail in the coffin of this thread.
Last edited:
Show me those texts because all I have seen is some text that say “sorry about today” or something like that which could mean anything. You do realize if they had a text from him that says “sorry for showing you my pecker” that’s about all they would need for charges. It’s not as cut and dry as you make it out. All of the evidence is he said she said and circumstantial at best.
Football can't get here soon enough.Agree to disagree and part friends. Football coming soon!
Because you have no leg to stand on anymore in the argument. You should change your name to Chihuahua. They are good at running away with their tell tucked between their legs. All the evidence is testimony which basically means nothing in my opinion. That’s not enough to ruin a guys career over.
This can end knowing I know what I’m talking about and you don’t. I predicted correctly that he was looking at a year suspension, major fine from the get…. You over in left field talking about some nonsense over what you believe evidence is and showing your legal ignorance. But hey, have at fool
I don’t have to show you squat, you just shown us how stupid and ignorant you are. Man, get outta here kid, you almost sound like a flat earth er. I never imagined there was this much ignorance in the world till I met about 4-5 individuals… 1 of them is you! Let that sink in for a sec
Well, he's obviously gonna get a year at this point b/c Goodell essentially has unilateral authority.
I'm surprised the NFLPA agreed to such an arrangement.
I can't tell you how exhausted I am of reading posts/articles exclaiming how absurd it is that Player X was found guilty of __________ and suspended for Y games while Watson is only suspended 6 games after being accused. It is what it is. We live in an ignorant world. Stuff like this just dampens even further my interest in sports. I long ago lost interest in mainstream entertainment for the same reason and it's trending that way for sports.
I'm surprised the NFLPA agreed to such an arrangement.
I can't tell you how exhausted I am of reading posts/articles exclaiming how absurd it is that Player X was found guilty of __________ and suspended for Y games while Watson is only suspended 6 games after being accused. It is what it is. We live in an ignorant world. Stuff like this just dampens even further my interest in sports. I long ago lost interest in mainstream entertainment for the same reason and it's trending that way for sports.
I think this distinction is what some people are missing.
Lol the irony of this post. I’m not the one that got disproved with a source while not providing one of my opinion and then took my ball and went home.
Do you get the sense of overwhelming irony, and the sense that this poster isn't even really being serious?
Throw in a small fine too.
The thread, complete with childish ranting, is pretty entertaining at this point. I choose to believe he wasn't being serious, and was going for entertaining anyway.
Last edited:
"small fine"....I guessed that right, but wasn't going to rub it in.Throw in a small fine too.
The thread, complete with childish ranting, is pretty entertaining at this point. I choose to believe he wasn't being serious, and was going for entertaining anyway.
Get unlimited access today.