Help me understand the conspiracy claim.
By posting this tweet, are you furthering a claim that Pelosi hired an assassin to kill the CEO of UHC because she had invested in a network security company that was hired by UHC to help sort out UHC's network breach, and the UHC CEO could expose her?
...if that is what the conspiracy is, and you are furthering it by posting the tweet, then please connect the dots.
What did he know that would have exposed her? Its already known that she invested in the network security company and its already known that UHC used the company for technical assistance.
What was there to expose? Was the CEO in on it and Pelosi paid him to use PaloAlto Networks? Did she mastermind the network breach in the hopes that PaloAlto would be used?
I am guessing here because I cant figure out why he had to be silenced.