Executive Summary —
Again you are clearly showing your intelligence.
Kushner's very well documented $2B matters not. Got it.
If I missed the point of your post, then obviously your post was pointless. **
He's an idiot but it's not his fault the Dems trotted out Hillary to run against him. A yellow dog would have defeated Trump. People decided even that egomania fueled TV host wasn't as bad a choice as Billary was. They've never forgiven Trump for winning... Dems or Repubs.
Yep. I fell for anybody but Hillary. Been an odd ride. Clinton had me longing for Bush 1. Obama had me longing for Bush 2. I thought Trump was pretty funny in an outsider, not toeing the political line kind of way until I realized who/what he really is and he led an attack on the capital that seems to not matter to much of my former party of character matters and US first folks. They don't seem to understand that trying to turn the constitution upside down is next level bad. He recently called for "termination of the constitution" to get him reinstated so he hasn't backed down.
You think Obama politicized them, and Bush/Trump didn't? Was Bushes mass firing of Dem prosecutors worse than Lois Leener, or not? Was Barr's complete mischaracterization of the Mueller report better or worse than Lois Lerner?
Give me one, ONE, example of the GOP ever supporting speech that they didn't already agree with, and I'll give you some credit. I've never seen it. It's patently ridiculous to label them as defenders of free speech when they only defend the speech they like.
Not arguing in good faith. Conservatives never do, their bullshite can't be upheld if they ever did.
Agreed, but when your side ignores things like the chain of custody of the laptop......then you're not investigating in good faith, and are best ignored. And we all know your sides long history of bad faith "investigations" of your political opponents.
He can be a scumbag....and have false accusations made about him for political gain. You gonna admit that in good faith?Yeah. That's gotta be fake.
I’ve admitted Trump does things I don’t like.
Or maybe your reading comprehension just sucks?If I missed the point of your post, then obviously your post was pointless. **
In all seriousness, when you are communicating with a neurodivergent person, you need to be direct and to the point.
It shouldn’t be difficult for you. You are usually to the point unless you’re babbling about different theories….
Your last sentence is all you needed to post.
’d gold bricks and the media would have claimed he stole the food to produce the gold poop. Or that he pooped the gold bricks on Russian hookers.What’s funny is you are so inconsistent. You support joe Biden but didn’t like Clinton?
Supporting the 2nd amendment is supporting free speech and the people of this country. I realize you are so dumb you can’t see that.
Chain of custody or not. Do you believe the
you see on the laptop? If you don’t you are dumb. If you do, great. Who cares about the chain of custody if the **** is real? IT IS REAL.Good faith? It’s a direct question based on your direct quote.
It’s so real it’s gotta be fake in their mind.Yeah. That's gotta be fake.
What false accusations were made against him?
One could say the same for today's liberals
The GOP doesn't support speech. It's not a free speech organization. But its members do not attack free speech in anything close to the same degree or frequency that democrats do. Now would they if they had the same control and influence over traditional and social media and corporate board rooms? It's certainly possible. There are only a minority of people out there that believe in free speech.
Do you really think there's not one example of the GOP supporting freedom of speech out of principle? I could easily find a few and within a day find hundreds. But, I don't think that will change your mind because I suspect you'll look for some weird caveat you think confirms your biases because you'll find some Republican who opposes free speech in some instances. Are you specifically referring to a party, an organization that's primarily concerned with winning elections and raising money, individual Republicans in office or are you also including conservatives in general? Here's a conservative publication supporting freedom of speech. It's easy to find more. I can also easily find liberal institutions that criticize the actions of some Dems. https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/you-either-support-free-speech-or-you-dont/
Well, the ones parading weren't a big threat. What about the ones who stormed the capital and threatened violence to overturn an election? Some are now in prison for breaking the law. I also think the bureaucracy might self-politicize to a large degree. Most in the bureaucracy are on the left and are likely engaged in self-preservation. Progressives take care of themselves and other progressives in ways Republicans don't. Thus, even in red states, the dominant culture in universities, for instance, isn't conservative but progressive and universities are filled with profs who are progressive. Plus in red states there are all sorts of institutions that are staffed by progressives, especially non-profits. There aren't many institutions and businesses outside of the South that are as welcoming to those who are openly conservative as they are to progressives. Republicans concentrate on tax cuts, easy access to guns and abortion. Right now they're catering to the rich, even though many rich people now vote for Dems, religious conservatives, and the working class through slogans and insulting the libz (a lot of Republicans are fine with politicians just insulting those they dislike). They don't seem to care that all sorts of institutions are becoming more progressive or that young, educated Americans are more progressive than prior generations.
How many guns did they use? Those people should be in prison, and threatening violence with guns is definitely bad and people that did that should be in prison, but it's not a threat to the country. Threatening violence without guns is also bad but not generally sufficient to overthrow a government. There weren't widespread riots. They didn't set fire to a bunch of buildings. They didn't kill anybody. Lots of things are bad that are not rioting, arson, or murder, but you're generally not going to topple a government or come close to it by invading a government building and not having any of those things.
Well, for better or worse, National Review is irrelevant. They don't wield any influence. I'm sure there's probably a left leaning organization that you could point to that believes in free speech. Maybe not if nothing has filled the void since the ACLU stopped caring about civil liberties.
"Threatening violence without guns is also bad but not generally sufficient to overthrow a government."
It certainly isn't as influential as it once was. But, I wasn't responding to a post that asked for influence and just one that asked for Republicans who supported free speech. And I agree about the ACLU. My response was in reference to the absolute certainty expressed in another post.
Or maybe your reading comprehension just sucks?
Horseshack and boom doom are talking about trump and improprieties.
PDH: Ok what about giving excessive money to Ukraine, what about HRC colluding with Ukraine, what about Hunter Biden?
Direct Eagle: people forgot about HRC and Ukraine bc Ukraine and Russia went to war.
It's possible that it's another step in that direction, but it's just as possible it's not. It's bad, but it's not as bad as rioting we've had in the last two years. And again, the people making the most noise about Jan 6th clearly aren't as concerned as they claim.
1. What better economy? At best, all he did was continue the path Obama was on. The data shows no noticeable improvement from Obama Era growth. At all.
Dems are like Republicans. What's good for the party is good to them. Dems have been election deniers in the recent past. Plus, a lot of progressives confuse morality with ideology or really fuse the two to present themselves as morally superior to others. But, that doesn't mean that January 6, should be dismissed. I don't think those sorts of actions should become normalized and accepted and I'm glad many of those nitwits are going to prison. Modern progressives, especially young, white progressives, remind me of some of the really religious conservatives I knew in Mississippi when I went to State. "Jesus was a supply-sider and you're immoral if you don't agree" types.
