So you saying we were telling everybody that Spurrier Jr was the guy? Then he wasn't? I liked what I saw in the bowl game and hoped we were heading that way with the trickoration, and the jet sweep motion and reverses and stuff. I thought we were getting a glimpse into the future. Tulu leaving would absolutely suck but he has his own decisions to make. Would be fun to see if we could really use him to his full potential for the next couple years.
Tulu in the portal
- Thread starter klong-dog
- Start date
You have to keep in mind that Ibdancin is very butthurt that Leachs offensive staff was not retained.
I wouldn't have been mad to be honest. Leach's system worked, even with the portal and everything they were still getting things in order to get his system fully in place. Sucks that we will never know. And did we burn a bridge with spurrier?
Yes we will. Simmons had every option in America. He chose State from the beginning and is one of the most loyal players we've had. Those are the type we still need.
The worst offenders are the guys who didn't have options, then suddenly do after a year or two. They are showing their true colors (like RaRa).
I’ll bet you $100 and 20 to 1 odds we have a really good player play 3 full years at msu. Starts his career at msu and ends his college career at msu.
I think it's pretty obvious that we SHOULD have done this. If it didn't work, retool it next year. Nobody would have blamed Arnett for doing so.
I mean Arnett himself was chosen to keep continuity. Then he used his power to break the continuity on offense.
All I will say is that it better work out next year.
Doesn’t have to work out next year anymore than “sticking with the air raid” would have.
Our fans are as dumb and terrible as everyone else.
You liked the 13 points our offense scored?
Shut up. You’re not even coherent. Your points are all over the place. All you want to do is argue.
Our offense sucked in the bowl game and most of the second half of the season, but hell, we won 9 games.
I thought the Zach Arnett hire was a good idea to decrease the amount of attrition.
It’s occurring anyway.
I thought the Zach Arnett hire was a good idea to decrease the amount of attrition.
It’s occurring anyway.
I liked that we tried some different things. And I can't help but think that QB play has been a problem and that Sawyer must have been awful and that at times our receivers couldn't catch when good QB play happened. Like how a baseball offense can't string together hits or the right hits to generate runs.
Lane is butt hurt he is quickly becoming irrelevant.
Lane Train needs to keep the bear sharts intrigued!
Lane Train needs to keep the bear sharts intrigued!
This narrative tanks when you realize we won. Against a top 5 defense. After 3 weeks of a death, a new coach and all that goes with it.
17 it. I just don’t care anymore. Maybe I’m just a bad fan, but I’m not going to contribute to an annual bidding war just to keep our players. Much less to bring new mercenaries in.
Perhaps you misread my post. I think blowing up what we had going was a mistake. Even though the offense wasn’t on point, I thought Zach would keep some continuity, but that hasn’t happened.
*replying to onewoof
*replying to onewoof
Last edited:
His NFL future is as a kick returner / special teams guy. It’s simple as that. With our defense next year, he’s not going to have many opportunities to return kicks.
Just gotta find a team with a sh!tty defense to showcase his talents.
Just gotta find a team with a sh!tty defense to showcase his talents.
You don’t know what anybody said. You’re a douchebag. Nobody of importance would ever tell you anything.
Yep, it’s become entertainment only, whereas before it was more. I can still stomach baseball, but I’m gravitating towards the NFL in a big way.
No I don’t want to argue. I simple want people to be reasonable and most are emotional idiots.
you said if we stick with the air raid it didn’t have to work out next year but if we change offenses it does?
how does that make any logical sense?
17'm all
And that he's the same troll (Thomas) that's on other boards. He's a straight up troll.
Our qb play regressed this year but but Mississippi state standards it was really good.
and 2021 and 2020 is was really really good.
Because it would be about continuity, which was the only reason Arnett was hired as well.
Now that he pivoted away from that, it better pay off.
The narrative?
We weren’t great in the bowl game.
Spurrier jr hasn’t shown much in potential as an OC at 51.
Those are facts not narrative.
he may end up a great OC but to date it would have been underwhelming. I’m 100% more on board with who we hired based on potential vs spurrier jr.
So continuity that doesn’t work is better than change that doesn’t work after 1 year?
really?
i bet you are hell with investing money!
If continuity wasn’t a priority, would we have hired Arnett to be our coach in any other situation?
It has worked before. Had a hiccup in some games this year. But we also had a bunch of 4/5/6 year players who had been playing in the Air Raid most of their careers
it is very easy to see the reasoning here. We didn’t want a repeat of 2018, now we’re staring it right in the face
We hired Arnett for continuity in a number of ways and bc we didn’t have an AD to help make the hire.
recruiting mainly
he held the class together and it was pretty damn good
he didn’t keep a 51 year old who has never been successful as an offensive coordinator and hasn’t been a great recruiter
BIG 17ING DEAL.
It’s very easy to see the reasoning to keeping a 51 year old with no real success as an OC.
whats more likely? He would have built on Leachs success?
Stayed the same or gotten worse? These two are most likely but not certain.
17 off and go be an emotional moron somewhere else.
It was to keep everyone from transferring and a signing class from folding. There was never a commitment to anything beyond that. I like Arnett, but we could've had a full search. We panicked. I do still think Arnett will be ok, but we'll know fast because we should be good.
And we aren't done losing players for those that want to lose their minds over it. You're about to have your big moment.
Then you cut bait after that year. But you give everyone a chance (like Arnett is getting).
You are the emotional one. Just towing the line.
No one is losing their minds. We can go replace players. But it doesn’t make much sense to lose Tulu. People are right to be concerned about that.
Hahaha towing the line is sticking with the normal.
what Arnett is doing isn’t toeing the line and I like it.
I’m sorry you think you are smarter than him.
good luck at that.
Latest posts
-
We are so much worse than anyone else in the…
- Latest: Called3rdstrikedawg
-
-
Mets Pitching is un<17>believable- Latest: Bulldog Bruce
Get unlimited access today.