Players opt out of Bowls now for one simple reason - it has become "acceptable".
It was just a few years ago that the talking heads were all aglow jabbering about the RB from Stanford "opting out" of a bowl game (even though, IIRC, he had some nagging injuries).
Now? It has become an accepted practice.
This, despite it being no more rational or reasoned than a player simply dropping out at any time during the season. ie: What rationale would there be for, say, Fashanu, dropping out of the Bowl game - but not having dropped out of the games vs Rutgers and MSU? Aside from one being more acceptable to all the talking heads and social media-ites? There is none.
Players opting out is, without question, a selfish/self-centered action. Whenever they do it. The question is: "Is it OK for them to be selfish?"
Generally, as sports fans/media, we have become accepting of that vav Bowl Games - but not, as of yet, with just shutting things down at some point in the middle of the season (though that may come soon enough). But, rationally, there is no difference between one and the other.
As "College Football" moves more and more to being viewed as a "minor league audition for the NFL" (that is, for all intents and purposes what it is now - at least in the minds of players at the big $$$ programs, but just not yet viewed by most as being that), more and more cases of shutting it down will certainly occur.
It was just a few years ago that the talking heads were all aglow jabbering about the RB from Stanford "opting out" of a bowl game (even though, IIRC, he had some nagging injuries).
Now? It has become an accepted practice.
This, despite it being no more rational or reasoned than a player simply dropping out at any time during the season. ie: What rationale would there be for, say, Fashanu, dropping out of the Bowl game - but not having dropped out of the games vs Rutgers and MSU? Aside from one being more acceptable to all the talking heads and social media-ites? There is none.
Players opting out is, without question, a selfish/self-centered action. Whenever they do it. The question is: "Is it OK for them to be selfish?"
Generally, as sports fans/media, we have become accepting of that vav Bowl Games - but not, as of yet, with just shutting things down at some point in the middle of the season (though that may come soon enough). But, rationally, there is no difference between one and the other.
As "College Football" moves more and more to being viewed as a "minor league audition for the NFL" (that is, for all intents and purposes what it is now - at least in the minds of players at the big $$$ programs, but just not yet viewed by most as being that), more and more cases of shutting it down will certainly occur.