Are there people that really believe that play was offsides?
The Oilers?
Are there people that really believe that play was offsides?
I meant Bob Nystrom’s Cup winning goal against the Flyers in 1980.The Oilers?
YesAre there people that really believe that play was offsides?
Wow! Have these people ever watched the video of the goal? Or is it just some sort of an urban myth?
I would have paid him. I sort of knew his wife wanted to go though. How he explained it, it was a discounted price for a season ticket holder. I turned him down before game 6. Best guess on the face on the upper bowl would be $7-8 hundred? I only go to a few games/year so I'm sort of out of the loop.Were you being gifted that ticket or would you have been paying? I saw that minimum get-in-the-door price was around $1150 on Friday night. Any idea what face value on those upper deck tickets are?
I know you were responding to the other poster that brought up the Nystrom winning goal, but I had thought the controversy was about an earlier goal in the game. Nystrom's was good, but....I meant Bob Nystrom’s Cup winning goal against the Flyers in 1980.
Right, neither goal was close. Sutter was way over the blue line before that puck entered the zone, Nystrom hadn’t even touched the blueline when Tonelli carried the puck completely across.I know you were responding to the other poster that brought up the Nystrom winning goal, but I had thought the controversy was about an earlier goal in the game. Nystrom's was good, but....
At 0:09 of the video, the puck clearly was out of the zone on the pass back.
TSN piece on Game 6 1980 Stanley Cup Final - Duane Sutter Goal on Missed Offside Call (youtube.com)
Sounds about right.I feel like the only way Florida wins is to do it 1-0, 2-1 style.
That was an all-time directing disaster by ESPN as soon as the horn sounded. Not enough shots of the immediate dogpile, too many shots of the fans, totally missed the initial lifting of the Cup by Barkov, the muting of audio cuz OMG, they dropped an F bomb!, they get a poignant shot of Maurice lifting the Cup and instead of staying with the entire thing, they cut to two needless shots of the crowd. It's so pathetic for someone who knows how this gets done to watch supposed longtime professionals botch a championship celebration situation.
Yep, we still live in a Puritan society on TV where swearing is the worst thing in the world. The funny part is there were no mics around Maurice when he had the Cup so you could only read lips.I experienced audio dropouts several times during tonight’s broadcast, including when Maurice held the Cup.
ABC/ESPN can’t even get out of its own way any longer.That was an all-time directing disaster by ESPN as soon as the horn sounded. Not enough shots of the immediate dogpile, too many shots of the fans, totally missed the initial lifting of the Cup by Barkov, the muting of audio cuz OMG, they dropped an F bomb!, they get a poignant shot of Maurice lifting the Cup and instead of staying with the entire thing, they cut to two needless shots of the crowd. It's so pathetic for someone who knows how this gets done to watch supposed longtime professionals botch a championship celebration situation.
The one earlier in the game definitely was. The linesman owned up to it--and got a lot of respect for so doing.Are there people that really believe that play was offsides?
Wow! Have these people ever watched the video of the goal? Or is it just some sort of an urban myth?
Perhaps LIV Golf should start covering the finals.Yep, we still live in a Puritan society on TV where swearing is the worst thing in the world. The funny part is there were no mics around Maurice when he had the Cup so you could only read lips.