It's OK, didn't take it that way. You gave a reason for not wanting to discuss the Soros "conspiracy" and I just stated that I didn't suffer from those conditions. S'all good.
Jack Del Rio, how ridiculous is the statement
- Thread starter Prestonyte
- Start date
George Soros conspiracies? That’s a liberal denying the vast influence Soros buys with his money to destroy this country in his quest to start a one world communist government. Liberals won’t debate something they can’t defend, so they will just call it a right wing conspiracy to avoid having to debate the truth. It’s sickening.
Unless you can absolutely prove it, it is nothing but an allegation and, therefore, the basis of a conspiracy theory. Same with Koch brothers, Gates, Gallo, Mars, etc. etc. Wealthy people always throw money at causes they support or which benefit themselves. Dates all the way back before Rockefeller, Carnegie, Morgan, etc. were doing it.
FWIW, Ron Rivera has backtracked somewhat and now says that Del Rio was fined $100,000, not for the substance of his comments, but because his comments were a distraction for the team.
They are not the same. But you know that.
I just hope you people don't really believe the things you write.
And if protesters want to live, they should stay home and not break into the US Capitol.
Here is evidence. It is well known that Soros funded far left district attorneys and prosecutors to implement soft on crime policies that reduce sentences, reduce criminal charges, and reduce or eliminate bail for known and repeat offenders. Putting these criminals right back on the street to continue committing felonies. These DA's and prosecutors are all over the country in liberal urban areas and likely played a huge part in not stopping or pressing charges against Atifa and BLM rioters. Soros is using his money to influence elections in an effort to increase crime throughout our major urban areas to destroy our culture and country, so he and is comrades can build their Utopian society out of the ashes of their destruction. This is not a conspiracy theory, this is well known and documented.
https://www.westernjournal.com/soros-funded-prosecutor-removed-disqualified-judge-realizes/
Soros is not the only one having significant Marxist influence on the American justice system - there is also Gates, Bezos, China, and others. And we can thank the Bush family for starting the destruction of the American immigration system leading to increased crime related to drugs and gang violence crossing the border with a huge impact on the justice system.
Yes, I know and agree. However getting a progressive poster who claims Soros “conspiracies “ to respond to that would be impossible so I focused on the low hanging fruit. Marxists need their useful idiots.
I agree they're not the same. The protests at the SC judges houses (minus the one guy) seem to be non violent.
I'd say that Jan 6th falls in between the SC protests and the summer of mayhem on the violence scale.
I would disagree on the last statement though. I feel like there was a bit less restraint used by that cop than by many others in similar situations. And if his victims actions were enough to warrant being shot, the bar is pretty low and a LOT more people would be shot during protests.
Non-violent but breaking the law just the same. Very few charges stemming from Jan. 6th were for violence - trespassing is the majority of charges. SCOTUS protesters should be charged with same - the statute is clear, they are not allowed to protest at SCOTUS homes or intimidate in any way. Yet they have not been charged. There is no will to prosecute obvious crimes due to politics which is the problem with the current justice system.
There are no conspiracy theories. The government uses that to label people who are onto the truth. The truth always comes to light and it is coming now.
We could stop the protests at Kananaugh's home. Let several patriots go join them and let's see who survives.
If we took in, “the totality of the circumstances “, as you say, even Democrats would be wanting some personnel changes in our highest office
As I said, wealthy people on both sides funds causes they believe in and since Citizens United, proliticians also......legally. And the prosecutor should have been removed from office, but its almost impossible to charge them with any crime due to prosecutorial immunity.
Actually an old school fiscal conservative that detests the populist turn that both parties have taken.
I have already said that the USSC protesters should be arrested pursuant to 18 U.S. 1507 which makes it illegal to protest in front of a courthouse or a judge’s home with the intent to influence a judicial position. However, while that particular statute has not been ruled unconstitutional, one issue is the Supreme Court in United States v. Grace, 461 U.S. 171 (1983), found that a statute that prohibited protests on sidewalks outside of the Supreme Court was unconstitutional, though legal experts generally agree that targeted, stationary protests outside of a justice’s home are prohibited under that federal law. Basically the law can be a gray area and often is, it is not always as black and white as people would like.
The immigration enforcement issue actually started in 1998 when GA Senator Paul Coverdell complained about the INS enforcement on the Vidalia onion farms. Deals were made with the INS regarding migrant farm workers.
It's my understanding that Biden has a speech impediment, not dementia.
Every president has "handlers."
I wasn't really speaking to the legality, but the level of violence for each.
The SC protests, while illegal, have at least been pretty non violent. (Minus the assassination attempt).
It's a huge step up to get to where Jan 6th was, with violent rioting.
It also another huge step up to get to the summer of love, where the violent rioting was sustained, encouraged and continued for weeks/months.
yea, right. That's your difference?
Gotta do better than that. It's the same - the will to prosecute all lawbreakers regardless of politics is the real difference.
I've heard of the stuttering excuse as well. It seems it's only recently been dredged back up as his speech and faculties have declined in recent years.
The majority of charges for Jan. 6 are for trespassing not violence (a few assault charges). There was no burning of federal buildings(one fire) and killing of police officers - none of those charges have been made. DOJ has tried very hard to make more substantial charges but failed.
We are talking recent history here and not comparing a bunch of hippies to BLM/Antifa.
I don't understand the breaking of the law but not violent argument. A branch of the federal govt. is being attacked by the SCOTUS protesters and must be prosecuted the same as if they were outside the houses of Sotomayor, Kagan, Roberts, etc. regardless of political will.
Every time he goes off-script he says some utter nonsense, like "9mm blows the lungs out of the body." ????? That's not a speech impediment. You could write his nonsensical comments for days. He was at least speaking clearly when he said them.
Jan 6 was nothing but a FBI/CIA operation. Tons of plants were in that crowd that day. Trump repeatedly said to march and protest peacefully. Bottom line....it is a sham.
Last edited:
Wrong. Kap lost his job because he isn't very good. Pretty funny that Kap said the NFL is a "slave plantation" but is consistently begging to be let back in.
You're right. He clearly can not make a coherent speech using his own thoughts and has way too much difficulty reading someone else's thoughts on the prompter. His hesitations between words is not speech impediment it's thought impediment.
Way to many coincidences and too many "I can't answer that" when members of congress (Cruz) question FBI/DOJ on whether their agents/informants/moles were involved.
Exactly. Who is Ray Epps? They won't answer it because they know exactly who he is.... a plant.
This would become a very interesting forum if we all posted comments in threads we are not going to read.
I wish a thread about Gamecock athletics could generate 4 pages of discussion.
The left wanted this to happen and they are still giddy over it. That's why they declined National Guard protection. A tiny fraction of the people present at that protest played right into their hands. But they get to paint the entire protest as some kind of coordinated attempted mob lynching. Thing is, these hearings won't help Biden get reelected. the cat's outta the bag that he's incredibly feeble. Any one who disagrees is simply lying at this point. Even if he's not demented, his policies are simply "America-last." And he's hurting the poor the most. I'd bet most of the people actually paying attention to these hearings are already straight D voters anyway.
And as I said, when given the evidence that proves George Soros trying to destroy our culture and way of life is not a conspiracy theory a useful idiot wouldn’t acknowledge the truth but would continue to deflect and change the subject. Your choice was “but both sides do it” which is BS but a common reply by a useful idiot that can’t debate the issue at hand. Crime is rampant in Liberal cities because of George Soros and the marxists that follow him. I don’t live in a liberal city so I chuckle when the liberals get assaulted or murdered because that’s what the votes for.
Get unlimited access today.