TLDR; but old people do have a smell about them. Not a pleasing one either
And I know your parents were MORE than happy to do what they could for you and understand (not always agreeing with LOL ) that things are going to change from generation to generation. I suspect they raised you to think for yourself and do what YOU think is right . I just don't get the stereotyping of people they don't even know by some on here because they are in a certain age group.My comment was just a general comment on aging. I'm very appreciative of my parents and what they had to do to allow me to stand on their shoulders and take the next step.
You ought to be more appreciative. The founder of TRH is a Boomer.TLDR; but old people do have a smell about them. Not a pleasing one either
Reagan’s tax cut slashed revenues by 2.9% of GDP.Taxes were too high. Western European countries cut marginal tax rates too. Funding for most things is still up. What programs do you think have been cut too much? We spend more on public education than almost all other countries and more on majority non-white public schools than on majority white public schools, and we spend about the same amount of our gdp on social programs as Canada does. Smart, rich people do know how to arrange outcomes in their favor. Smart, rich social workers, for instance, know how to get jobs in government and with non-profits that focus on helping the poor that pay a lot more in salary and benefits to them than the poor get out of those programs.
Not my Meme. But isn't that what it says?"responsible for today's hard time" O.K. help me out and I'm being serious. Poe's Law?
You obviously don't know the government workers I know. Full paid pensions, health insurance, short work hours, long vacations, long sick leave, no expectations regarding work performance, and they get a 2nd career after 20 years. It's a different class.Reagan’s tax cut slashed revenues by 2.9% of GDP.
ERTA transformed the Republican Party from a party of fiscal rectitude into a party whose main domestic policy goal is to cut taxes
We need taxes to pay for things and taxes were too high on the common guy, but not the Rich. https://www.americanprogress.org/ar...ly-responsible-for-the-increasing-debt-ratio/
Quick list of things gone to hell since we cut taxes.
Infrastructure:
Bridges![]()
US Infrastructure Grade: Explore the Categories | ASCE 2021
For the first time in 20 years, our infrastructure is out of the D range. We take a look at the US infrastructure grade for the sector categories analyzed.infrastructurereportcard.org
Airports
Dmas
Levees
Drinking Water
Inland Waterways
Parks
Roads
Schools
Stormwater
Transit
Wastewater
Public health
Mental health
I'll add Broadband to the list as well even though it was not a thing in 1981.
Smart, Rich, Government social workers is not a thing. Unless you are in Congress, you don't get "Rich" working for the government.
Somewhat. But it's irrefutable (to everyone but Boomers) that the Boomers have held on to power long past when other generations would have, and thus some things aren't fixed just because Boomers don't want to fix them. Things will change quickly (compared to the last 50 years) once they finally let go.That's not a boomer problem, it's a PEOPLE problem. It will never go away either.
That's actually not an answer and it's just of list of your complaints about America including infrastructure items that are more expensive to improve than decades ago (look up cost disease). Some of those things are fine, some definately need to be improved. That's pretty common around the world. Also, I got rich working for the government and I know others who have as well. It's not hard to move into the top 10% in income. "Gone to hell" is an interesting phrase. Have you by any chance travelled outside of America? What countries are your models for the ideology that animates your view of reality? FYI, it's not hard to find people saying we should both raise and lower taxes. Economists are notorious for disagreeing. Tax rich people, I don't care as long as it's not too much. It won't reduce the debt much. BTW, nothing you've written disputes anything I wrote. We spend more now as a percentage of GDP on the things you mentioned. Also, you do realize that Dems have been in charge at times too, including a non-boomer who served two terms pre-Trump.Reagan’s tax cut slashed revenues by 2.9% of GDP.
ERTA transformed the Republican Party from a party of fiscal rectitude into a party whose main domestic policy goal is to cut taxes
We need taxes to pay for things and taxes were too high on the common guy, but not the Rich. https://www.americanprogress.org/ar...ly-responsible-for-the-increasing-debt-ratio/
Quick list of things gone to hell since we cut taxes.
Infrastructure:
Bridges![]()
US Infrastructure Grade: Explore the Categories | ASCE 2021
For the first time in 20 years, our infrastructure is out of the D range. We take a look at the US infrastructure grade for the sector categories analyzed.infrastructurereportcard.org
Airports
Dmas
Levees
Drinking Water
Inland Waterways
Parks
Roads
Schools
Stormwater
Transit
Wastewater
Public health
Mental health
I'll add Broadband to the list as well even though it was not a thing in 1981.
Smart, Rich, Government social workers is not a thing. Unless you are in Congress, you don't get "Rich" working for the government.
I don't, but I've always had a unique appreciation for older folks. Fortunately for me all of my points of reference were positive. I had great grandparents alive until I was in my early 30's, grandparents until I was in my late 30's/early 40's. I don't take any of it for granted. It hit me one day crossing the river bridge in Vicksburg. Somebody way older than me figured out how to bridge the MS so I don't have to. That was no small task. The way I see it, for those of us lucky enough to have had positive experiences with parents/older family members, they basically built a lot of bridges that we drive over every day without much thought or appreciation. I try not to lose sight of that fact and I try remain thankful for that jump start that I got.And I know your parents were MORE than happy to do what they could for you and understand (not always agreeing with LOL ) that things are going to change from generation to generation. I suspect they raised you to think for yourself and do what YOU think is right . I just don't get the stereotyping of people they don't even know by some on here because they are in a certain age group.
YEAH YALL 17ED USJust my thoughts here. I am mid 50's and have to admit that my generation as a whole has sucked in preparing the now 15-30 year olds for certain parts of life. Obviously there are always exceptions but think this is true for the majority. We let our success make our kids soft. We (wife and I) made a point to try to make kids not just physically, but also emotionally and psychologically grounded and strong but it was a constant battle against the influence of their peers. Their generation is on average, really soft and it's our fault as parents.
USER NAME CHECKS OUTNot my Meme. But isn't that what it says?
That's no different than any other generation. I'm just old enough to have heard this all before from the boomers. That could be an exact quote from the 60s. Every generation thinks the one before it screwed everything up and they are going to fix it as soon as THEY take power. I bet the early Cro-Magnons sat around and talked about how the Neanderthals had screwed things up and how THEY were going to fix it.Somewhat. But it's irrefutable (to everyone but Boomers) that the Boomers have held on to power long past when other generations would have, and thus some things aren't fixed just because Boomers don't want to fix them. Things will change quickly (compared to the last 50 years) once they finally let go.
The first half of the 20th century was anything but unified. We tend to view it through the lens of post Pearl Harbor and that lends everything a rosy light. Right up till December 7th this was a seriously divided country.E.B. Sledge wrote a book about his tours in the WW2 Pacific theatre as a Marine with some really hardened badazzes who were WW1 vets. The book was called “With The Old Breed” and was quite complimentary of his fathers generation. WW2 was a different war, but the human spirit it takes to win is the same.
A lot of boomers were real heroes in Vietnam. Some boomers were real ckunts, like Jane Fonda. That generation was split amongst themselves about themselves before the war even ended, not to mention how their own children interpreted that era later.
The split in this country began with that war. Veterans came home, not to parades, but to spit. I don’t think it’s been the same since. It taught us to put entire age groups of people into their stereotypical box.
This country will never again see the united human spirit seen in the 1st half of the 20th century. That era created so much for so many, subsequent generations are oblivious to what true simplicity is actually like.
When debates about whether the atom bombs really needed to be dropped, and whether the Holocaust was a hoax is all the evidence needed to impeach those who speak so much vitriol about the history of their ancestors and know nothing about history.
Total hogwash. Total! This county and its infrastructure has not gone to hell. You hear about the bad spots, both parties and the media LOVE to point those out. They don't tell you much about the overwhelming majority of things that are NOT bad. In a country this big there are always going to be a few bad spots. Not all of Europe is Switzerland either. We won't even get into the REST of the world.Reagan’s tax cut slashed revenues by 2.9% of GDP.
ERTA transformed the Republican Party from a party of fiscal rectitude into a party whose main domestic policy goal is to cut taxes
We need taxes to pay for things and taxes were too high on the common guy, but not the Rich. https://www.americanprogress.org/ar...ly-responsible-for-the-increasing-debt-ratio/
Quick list of things gone to hell since we cut taxes.
Infrastructure:
Bridges![]()
US Infrastructure Grade: Explore the Categories | ASCE 2021
For the first time in 20 years, our infrastructure is out of the D range. We take a look at the US infrastructure grade for the sector categories analyzed.infrastructurereportcard.org
Airports
Dmas
Levees
Drinking Water
Inland Waterways
Parks
Roads
Schools
Stormwater
Transit
Wastewater
Public health
Mental health
I'll add Broadband to the list as well even though it was not a thing in 1981.
Smart, Rich, Government social workers is not a thing. Unless you are in Congress, you don't get "Rich" working for the government.
Yes, and if you live long enough you will too.TLDR; but old people do have a smell about them. Not a pleasing one either
No one person should pay 70+% of their income to taxes. The amount of income our Gov't takes in is plenty if it wouldn't be wasted and stolen by both sides of the the aisle. I was military and worked at MDOT, i saw wasted money everywhere. The idea of spending every penny your budgeted or you will lose it is a huge waste of taxpayers $.But you didn't "pay your taxes" you slashed taxes dramatically for the rich.
The YOUNGEST Boomer was 18 when Reagan cut the top rate from 73% to 28% the lowest this rate had been since 1925.
And now you ***** about " we cannot pay for XXX" you cut the funding for it, what did you expect?
you left out welfare,Reagan’s tax cut slashed revenues by 2.9% of GDP.
ERTA transformed the Republican Party from a party of fiscal rectitude into a party whose main domestic policy goal is to cut taxes
We need taxes to pay for things and taxes were too high on the common guy, but not the Rich. https://www.americanprogress.org/ar...ly-responsible-for-the-increasing-debt-ratio/
Quick list of things gone to hell since we cut taxes.
Infrastructure:
Bridges![]()
US Infrastructure Grade: Explore the Categories | ASCE 2021
For the first time in 20 years, our infrastructure is out of the D range. We take a look at the US infrastructure grade for the sector categories analyzed.infrastructurereportcard.org
Airports
Dmas
Levees
Drinking Water
Inland Waterways
Parks
Roads
Schools
Stormwater
Transit
Wastewater
Public health
Mental health
I'll add Broadband to the list as well even though it was not a thing in 1981.
Smart, Rich, Government social workers is not a thing. Unless you are in Congress, you don't get "Rich" working for the government.
Work-able people don't get big checks sitting at home. TANF is the closest thing to that there is, and it's virtually impossible to get in Mississippi even though the federal government sends 10s of millions for it. In fact, in Mississippi, most of it is stolen. it's been in the news recently.you left out welfare,
No reason an able bodied person should't have a job. Welfare should only exist for the disabled. A subsidy should pick up for those that don't meet the needs for basic living requirments. Not a lifetime or generations of welfare recipients.
So that's your definition of "Rich".You obviously don't know the government workers I know. Full paid pensions, health insurance, short work hours, long vacations, long sick leave, no expectations regarding work performance, and they get a 2nd career after 20 years. It's a different class.
That sounded kind of like Bill Clinton asking what's the definition of is is.So that's your definition of "Rich".
You know before 1980, a man could provide this for his family in the public sector.
But If fair pay, and decent benefits is what ya'll call "Rich" I'll conceded.
I expected a max income of $152,000 for a GS-15 (requires a PhD) is NOT a Rich person in America today. It's about 2 orders of magnitude from "Rich".
YEP. I read an article on a UK news site about a week ago. I wish I could remember where. There was an ex-MP (as recently as 2017) that moved to Mississippi to head a think tank. He was shocked to find landscapers making more money in Mississippi than executives do in the City.BTW, we really do have a political system that favors the elderly. They vote. About 45% of our budget is spent on services for those over 65 (Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security). Health care is incredibly expensive. Most of what's spent on our healthcare is spent during the last year of our lives. I just had a friend whose dad was in the hospital for 7 months before dying. The hospital billed millions. The family paid very little, he had Medicare and state-provided health insurance, and the family, already wealthy but for one slacker, stands to inherit quite a bit of money. As someone who will be over 65 in several years, I'm grateful for those government run, socialist-inspired programs. We'll, I'm fairly wealthy so I dont' need Medicaid. Young people don't realize how much wealth is transferred from them to pay for these programs. But, young Americans don't want these programs cut. Young people in Europe at least don't have to worry about some health issue bankrupting them. But, it's a tradeoff. I love Italy and France, great lifestyles and food and wine and beer, but the median income in those countries is less than the median income in Mississippi. A lot of young people have fantasies about what Europe actually offers. I don't know if they'd be willing to trade less wealth, smaller houses, no dryers, tiny cars etc for universal healthcare. Well, Europe generally has universal and private healthcare side-by-side as well.
Light weight beyotch we gave you Yacht Rock. Show some damn respect.
It's absolutely an answer to your question of " what needs more funding".That's actually not an answer and it's just of list of your complaints about America including infrastructure items that are more expensive to improve than decades ago (look up cost disease). Some of those things are fine, some definately need to be improved. That's pretty common around the world. Also, I got rich working for the government and I know others who have as well. It's not hard to move into the top 10% in income. "Gone to hell" is an interesting phrase. Have you by any chance travelled outside of America? What countries are your models for the ideology that animates your view of reality? FYI, it's not hard to find people saying we should both raise and lower taxes. Economists are notorious for disagreeing. Tax rich people, I don't care as long as it's not too much. It won't reduce the debt much. BTW, nothing you've written disputes anything I wrote. We spend more now as a percentage of GDP on the things you mentioned. Also, you do realize that Dems have been in charge at times too, including a non-boomer who served two terms pre-Trump.
You know that is the base pay right? They get a "cost of living" bonus (as high as 44%) among other things..
I expected a max income of $152,000 for a GS-15 (requires a PhD) is NOT a Rich person in America today. It's about 2 orders of magnitude from "Rich".
This is not true anymore.Americans of all ethnicities just need to finish high school, get a job, get married after finishing high school and not have kids out of wedlock and they'll enter the middle class. That sequence works for all ethnicities. And be prepared to sacrifice. People don't really get confortable with the amount of wealth they have until they're in their forties.
$220,000 is still 2 orders of magnitude from rich. It's very comfortable.You know that is the base pay right? They get a "cost of living" bonus (as high as 44%) among other things.
Yesyour pictures skipped the Boomer generation and GenX completely...
By your Meme, The Boomers are the weak men created by good times, that are responsible for today's hard times...
I would submit if you made do with only what we had back then, including the level of healthcare and technology available then, you still could. IF you had a TV it was B&W and got three channels. Virtually ANY cancer or heart disease (and a lot of others) diagnosis was a quick death sentence. Social Security was safe because a LOT of people didn't live long enough to collect it. A LOT of roads were not paved, and few outside the major cities were four lane. You drove THOUGH towns, not around them. No cell phones, and MANY land lines were party lines. Air conditioning was still a luxury. Cars were bare bones, no gadgets and few if any safety features. Most families, IF they had one, had ONE. Computers only existed in the military, government, or major cooperations and were very primitive. Your choices in the grocery store were extremely limited by today's standards. People dressed up to go on airplanes because only the wealthy could do it. I could go on and on in virtually every aspect of life. You are comparing apples to oranges.....except apples and oranges are more closely related to life then and life now.We used to be able to work one job and afford to buy a house and a car and send kids to college.
Yeah, so what do you think PHD level people make in the real world? Most of them don't qualify as rich by your standard.$220,000 is still 2 orders of magnitude from rich. It's very comfortable.
And to get that you need a PhD, and 20 years in.
Yes it is. It VERY much is. I know plenty of families like that.This is not true anymore.
Oh and houses, no gadgets either.I would submit if you made do with only what we had back then, including the level of healthcare and technology available then, you still could. IF you had a TV it was B&W and got three channels. Virtually ANY cancer or heart disease (and a lot of others) diagnosis was a quick death sentence. Social Security was safe because a LOT of people didn't live long enough to collect it. A LOT of roads were not paved, and few outside the major cities were four lane. You drove THOUGH towns, not around them. No cell phones, and MANY land lines were party lines. Air conditioning was still a luxury. Cars were bare bones, no gadgets and few if any safety features. Most families, IF they had one, had ONE. Computers only existed in the military, government, or major cooperations and were very primitive. Your choices in the grocery store were extremely limited by today's standards. People dressed up to go on airplanes because only the wealthy could do it. I could go on and on in virtually every aspect of life. You are comparing apples to oranges.....except apples and oranges are more closely related to life then and life now.
You actually don't know much. You can't say the obvious, we need some infrastructure improvements, and then just flail and rant. Top 10% is rich. It really is. Here' an article on what infrastructure costs here compared to Europe from a lefty publication: https://www.vox.com/22534714/rail-roads-infrastructure-costs-americaIt's absolutely an answer to your question of " what needs more funding".
Infrastructure is more costly to "fix" now because it was neglected so long. It has nothing to do with "Cost Disease". A bridge that needed paint, 20 years ago is rusted out now and needs total replacement. It's the same issue with the Jackson water supply. If you don't maintain stuff, it breaks and has to be replaced.
Top 10% is not "rich" anymore.
As for countries I've Travelled to that are "models of the ideology that animates me" Mostly western Europe, but also knowing my American History. We used to be able to build things. We used to be able to work one job and afford to buy a house and a car and send kids to college.
Thanks Grandpa, I had no idea we had better Technology now...I would submit if you made do with only what we had back then, including the level of healthcare and technology available then, you still could. IF you had a TV it was B&W and got three channels. Virtually ANY cancer or heart disease (and a lot of others) diagnosis was a quick death sentence. Social Security was safe because a LOT of people didn't live long enough to collect it. A LOT of roads were not paved, and few outside the major cities were four lane. You drove THOUGH towns, not around them. No cell phones, and MANY land lines were party lines. Air conditioning was still a luxury. Cars were bare bones, no gadgets and few if any safety features. Most families, IF they had one, had ONE. Computers only existed in the military, government, or major cooperations and were very primitive. Your choices in the grocery store were extremely limited by today's standards. People dressed up to go on airplanes because only the wealthy could do it. I could go on and on in virtually every aspect of life. You are comparing apples to oranges.....except apples and oranges are more closely related to life then and life now.