Report: Saquon Barkley rejected Giants offer worth up to $14 million

SurgeOne

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2021
524
813
93
Well whether you are aware of how business work. Lot’s of things happen that could be considered tampering or insider trading and yes even bribery. All these things happen every day. No multimillion dollar deal happens without one of the 3.

Agents get paid for a reason and the best ones have the information. Why do you think Saquon hasn’t signed yet? I’m an Eagles fan, Miles is a nice back but he’s not unique. I don’t care if Saquon signs with NY or if he goes somewhere else. NY stunk with him and they’ll stink without him. I just want to get the money he deserves. Miles got the max for his abilities.
Sign for $12M per yr and have language to force spending on a real o-line. That way he’ll be the #1 rusher in the league and make fartloads of money in adverts. Soak too much of that $, and that o-line will continue to suck
 
  • Wow
Reactions: CBusLion10

PSUJam

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
10,904
19,613
113
Not sure of the significance of the tweet. Full amount of a franchise tag contract is guaranteed. But, there's no guarantee that the Giants would tag Barkley in 2024. All it proves is that Dunleavy can multiply and add. Higher math for employees of The Post.
I believe Saquon retweeting it says that he's looking for a more guaranteed contract than they've offered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: psuno1

EPC FAN

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
688
862
93
The New York Giants and running back Saquon Barkley remain at an impasse despite both sides wanting to work out a long-term contract.

Midway through last season, the Giants offered Barkley a deal worth $12.5 million and it was rejected. General manager Joe Schoen promised to revisit negotiations early in the offseason and remained true to his word.

Prior to placing the franchise tag on his superstar running back, Schoen offered Barkley and his camp a deal worth $13 million and again it was rejected.

Bob Brookover of NJ Advance Media now reports that the Giants attempted to sweeten the pot, offering Barkley that $13 million deal with $1 million in additional incentives bringing the total possible contract to $14 million.

It didn’t move the needle.


Barkley and his camp reportedly remain firm on their $16 million ask, which would make him the highest-paid running back in the league alongside Christian McCaffrey, who has an AAV of $16.02 million.

At $14 million, assuming he maxed out his incentives, Barkley would have been the third-highest-paid running back in football behind the aforementioned McCaffrey and Alvin Kamara of the New Orleans Saints ($15 million AAV).

The Giants have until July 17 to work out a long-term deal or Barkley will be stuck playing on the franchise tender for $10.1 million, which is $3.9 million less than he could have potentially earned on the now-rejected deal.

Report: Saquon Barkley rejected Giants offer worth up to $14 million (yahoo.com)
This whole thread reminds me that WE ARE………until we’re not.
 

WestSideLion

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
3,377
3,751
113
Sign for $12M per yr and have language to force spending on a real o-line. That way he’ll be the #1 rusher in the league and make fartloads of money in adverts. Soak too much of that $, and that o-line will continue to suck
The Giants are paying Jones and Lawrence $65M a year from now on. That doesn’t leave a ton of $ for star OLs.
 

GrimReaper

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
6,419
8,872
113
Sign for $12M per yr and have language to force spending on a real o-line. That way he’ll be the #1 rusher in the league and make fartloads of money in adverts. Soak too much of that $, and that o-line will continue to suck
Sure, work that language into a contract, salary cap and all. Sorry, but Gettleman's gone.
 

Nitt1300

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,132
9,757
113

Ex-NFL agent: Giants pulling Saquon Barkley offer an ‘unusual step’​

96
John Fennelly
Thu, May 18, 2023 at 7:55 AM EDT



New York Giants Pro Bowl running back Saquon Barkley is still in contract limbo at the moment, having reportedly turned down several offers from the team while also expressing reluctance about playing under the franchise tag.
Barkley’s representatives and Giants general manager Joe Schoen have been working on and off on a contract extension that could pay Barkley anywhere from $12.5 to $14 million per year.
Barkley has reportedly turned down all offers from the Giants which forced them to use the franchise tag (worth $10.1 million for one year) on him in March.

Since then, the two sides have been volleying back and forth but it is believed that they are no closer to a deal.

In a recent interview with Ed Valentine of Big Blue View, CBS Sports salary cap analyst and former NFL agent, Joel Corry, said he was “surprised” the Giants pulled their original offer to Barkley.

“Usually (when) you table discussions, that offer remains. Pulling the offer raised eyebrows to me,” Corry said. “That’s an unusual step. Maybe that’s how Schoen is going to do things in the future, but that would send a message to me if I’m the player that this is going to be a truly tough negotiation.”

Corry also shot down the notion that the Giants will tag Barkley again next year at a cost of roughly $12 million.

“Not getting done. Two [franchise] tags is $22 million. You’ve gotta give the guy a way to save face in a negotiation. You’re not giving him a chance to save face,” he said.

Barkley wants to be compensated among the top backs in the league. The issue is, those numbers aren’t as lucrative as one might think. Only two backs — San Francisco’s Christian McCaffrey ($16 million) and New OrleansAlvin Kamara ($15 million) — are currently being paid over $12.5 million AAV.

That means Barkley and the Giants can’t be very far apart but it doesn’t seem like a deal is imminent. This could come down to July 17, which is the deadline for a franchise-tagged player to strike a long-term deal.

Until then, Barkley will sit out. And he could miss mandatory minicamp next month, which would create quite a media stir.

Ex-NFL agent: Giants pulling Saquon Barkley offer an ‘unusual step’ (yahoo.com)
 

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,619
4,414
113

Ex-NFL agent: Giants pulling Saquon Barkley offer an ‘unusual step’​

96
John Fennelly
Thu, May 18, 2023 at 7:55 AM EDT



New York Giants Pro Bowl running back Saquon Barkley is still in contract limbo at the moment, having reportedly turned down several offers from the team while also expressing reluctance about playing under the franchise tag.
Barkley’s representatives and Giants general manager Joe Schoen have been working on and off on a contract extension that could pay Barkley anywhere from $12.5 to $14 million per year.
Barkley has reportedly turned down all offers from the Giants which forced them to use the franchise tag (worth $10.1 million for one year) on him in March.

Since then, the two sides have been volleying back and forth but it is believed that they are no closer to a deal.

In a recent interview with Ed Valentine of Big Blue View, CBS Sports salary cap analyst and former NFL agent, Joel Corry, said he was “surprised” the Giants pulled their original offer to Barkley.

“Usually (when) you table discussions, that offer remains. Pulling the offer raised eyebrows to me,” Corry said. “That’s an unusual step. Maybe that’s how Schoen is going to do things in the future, but that would send a message to me if I’m the player that this is going to be a truly tough negotiation.”

Corry also shot down the notion that the Giants will tag Barkley again next year at a cost of roughly $12 million.

“Not getting done. Two [franchise] tags is $22 million. You’ve gotta give the guy a way to save face in a negotiation. You’re not giving him a chance to save face,” he said.

Barkley wants to be compensated among the top backs in the league. The issue is, those numbers aren’t as lucrative as one might think. Only two backs — San Francisco’s Christian McCaffrey ($16 million) and New OrleansAlvin Kamara ($15 million) — are currently being paid over $12.5 million AAV.

That means Barkley and the Giants can’t be very far apart but it doesn’t seem like a deal is imminent. This could come down to July 17, which is the deadline for a franchise-tagged player to strike a long-term deal.

Until then, Barkley will sit out. And he could miss mandatory minicamp next month, which would create quite a media stir.

Ex-NFL agent: Giants pulling Saquon Barkley offer an ‘unusual step’ (yahoo.com)
I thought I was going to read they pulled the franchise tag from him, then what happens? would somebody step up and give him what he wants? IMO not realistic in this NFL era
 

bbrown

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
10,122
21,327
113

Ex-NFL agent: Giants pulling Saquon Barkley offer an ‘unusual step’​

96
John Fennelly
Thu, May 18, 2023 at 7:55 AM EDT



New York Giants Pro Bowl running back Saquon Barkley is still in contract limbo at the moment, having reportedly turned down several offers from the team while also expressing reluctance about playing under the franchise tag.
Barkley’s representatives and Giants general manager Joe Schoen have been working on and off on a contract extension that could pay Barkley anywhere from $12.5 to $14 million per year.
Barkley has reportedly turned down all offers from the Giants which forced them to use the franchise tag (worth $10.1 million for one year) on him in March.

Since then, the two sides have been volleying back and forth but it is believed that they are no closer to a deal.

In a recent interview with Ed Valentine of Big Blue View, CBS Sports salary cap analyst and former NFL agent, Joel Corry, said he was “surprised” the Giants pulled their original offer to Barkley.

“Usually (when) you table discussions, that offer remains. Pulling the offer raised eyebrows to me,” Corry said. “That’s an unusual step. Maybe that’s how Schoen is going to do things in the future, but that would send a message to me if I’m the player that this is going to be a truly tough negotiation.”

Corry also shot down the notion that the Giants will tag Barkley again next year at a cost of roughly $12 million.

“Not getting done. Two [franchise] tags is $22 million. You’ve gotta give the guy a way to save face in a negotiation. You’re not giving him a chance to save face,” he said.

Barkley wants to be compensated among the top backs in the league. The issue is, those numbers aren’t as lucrative as one might think. Only two backs — San Francisco’s Christian McCaffrey ($16 million) and New OrleansAlvin Kamara ($15 million) — are currently being paid over $12.5 million AAV.

That means Barkley and the Giants can’t be very far apart but it doesn’t seem like a deal is imminent. This could come down to July 17, which is the deadline for a franchise-tagged player to strike a long-term deal.

Until then, Barkley will sit out. And he could miss mandatory minicamp next month, which would create quite a media stir.

Ex-NFL agent: Giants pulling Saquon Barkley offer an ‘unusual step’ (yahoo.com)
It would be a blast watching him play for the KC Chiefs.
 

WestSideLion

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
3,377
3,751
113
What’s interesting is that running back may be the first example of a positional group devaluing significantly in a short period.

The McCaffrey and Kamala deals are 2-3 years old and now top deals are maybe 40% lower in annual average comp. That’s crazy.

I can understand Saquon’s frustration, but the point about the agent is spot on. These offers are going down not up. It’s the agent’s job to manage that.
 

laKavosiey-st lion

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2021
8,930
6,324
113
It would be a blast watching him play for the KC Chiefs.
Chiefs know better than that:
Isiah Pacheco signed a 4 year, $3,739,108 contract with the Kansas City Chiefs, including a $79,108 signing bonus, $79,108 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $934,777.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Catch1lion

laKavosiey-st lion

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2021
8,930
6,324
113
The proper way;
D'Andre Swift's contract: Veteran will make $1.7M with Eagles in 2023. The Eagles traded for D'Andre Swift on Saturday, and they'll acquire the talented dual-threat running back at a valuable bargain. A second-round Lions pick out of Georgia; Swift will make $1.7 million in the final year of his rookie deal.
and
2022-2022. Rashaad Penny signed a 4 year, $10,765,438 contract with the Seattle Seahawks, including a $5,909,409 signing bonus, $9,796,099 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $2,691,360.
these 2 are gonna KILL this year
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: s1uggo72

Got GSPs

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
7,711
9,620
113
Sign for $12M per yr and have language to force spending on a real o-line. That way he’ll be the #1 rusher in the league and make fartloads of money in adverts. Soak too much of that $, and that o-line will continue to suck
Can you really have a contract that says the team must spend on an O line…
 
  • Like
Reactions: s1uggo72

GrimReaper

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
6,419
8,872
113
Can you really have a contract that says the team must spend on an O line…
A clause to the effect that "Team A must spend a minimum of $XX,000,000 on offensive linemen or (spell out consequences of failure to comply)......." For pretty obvious reasons, no team would accede to that demand, so, no.
 

psykim

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
3,775
4,839
113
Hope Barkley is getting good advice. Reality is that as good as he is NFL RBs tend to have short careers due to injuries. Hope this gets resolved before training camp as i root for the Giants and training camps holdouts often hurt team chemistry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LionJim

Got GSPs

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
7,711
9,620
113
A clause to the effect that "Team A must spend a minimum of $XX,000,000 on offensive linemen or (spell out consequences of failure to comply)......." For pretty obvious reasons, no team would accede to that demand, so, no.
Although, Patrick Ewing once had a contract that said he had to be the highest paid center in the NBA (or something along those lines).
 

GrimReaper

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
6,419
8,872
113
Although, Patrick Ewing once had a contract that said he had to be the highest paid center in the NBA (or something along those lines).
That's reasonably simple and bi-lateral; it only deals with a player's comp and nothing more. I can imagine Joe Schoen's reaction to the initial request, something along the lines of "how much more of my job do you want me to cede to you?" Or, "would you like me to tell Coach Daboll that you have to approve any play he calls?"
 

WestSideLion

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
3,377
3,751
113
That's reasonably simple and bi-lateral; it only deals with a player's comp and nothing more. I can imagine Joe Schoen's reaction to the initial request, something along the lines of "how much more of my job do you want me to cede to you?" Or, "would you like me to tell Coach Daboll that you have to approve any play he calls?"
It seems the Giants had to prioritize resigning, QB, DT and RB. We know how that got stack ranked.

I don’t blame Schoen at all for how he’s approached this. The Giants have a GM acting in their best long term interests for a change. Even that bad Jones contract isn’t a terribly long time and they had no other options.
 
  • Like
Reactions: s1uggo72

GrimReaper

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
6,419
8,872
113
It seems the Giants had to prioritize resigning, QB, DT and RB. We know how that got stack ranked.

I don’t blame Schoen at all for how he’s approached this. The Giants have a GM acting in their best long term interests for a change. Even that bad Jones contract isn’t a terribly long time and they had no other options.
I dislike the Giants almost as much as I do the J-E-T-S, Jets, Jets, Jets. But when the players start running the asylum, that's time to fire both the players and the front office. Saquon is smart enough to know that even if some of his fans aren't.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: s1uggo72

PSUriseANDfire

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
2,423
3,270
113
Le'Veon was older and dumber then than Barkley
Barkley will get at or near what McCaffrey got. Those two are both entering their what is usually a RB's 3 year prime window before the fall. Bell was a product of a system. Until last year Barkley had to get around the Giants system.

I agree paying RBs big money is not usually smart but a few are different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LionsRoar89

LionJim

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
11,005
15,088
113
Le'Veon was older and dumber then than Barkley
Barkley will get at or near what McCaffrey got. Those two are both entering their what is usually a RB's 3 year prime window before the fall. Bell was a product of a system. Until last year Barkley had to get around the Giants system.

I agree paying RBs big money is not usually smart but a few are different.
It’s a fact of NFL life that different positions pay differently. Too bad for Saquon. I am nominally agnostic on holdouts, as I consider them to be just part of the game, but he’s passing up an awful lot of money. OTOH: guaranteed money. Ah, WTHDIK? Saquon will Saquon, he’s good at this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LionsRoar89

WestSideLion

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
3,377
3,751
113
Le'Veon was older and dumber then than Barkley
Barkley will get at or near what McCaffrey got. Those two are both entering their what is usually a RB's 3 year prime window before the fall. Bell was a product of a system. Until last year Barkley had to get around the Giants system.

I agree paying RBs big money is not usually smart but a few are different.
I don't think Saquon gets near what McCaffrey and Kamara got. The talking heads (one a former NFL GM) on NFL XMSirius were saying the RB franchise tag number will actually go down between this year and next.

There were something like 20 RBs drafted and another 27 signed as rookie free agents. There are just so many productive players out there at RB and the separation of impact isn't worth going from $500k a year to $16 million. It's just not in the current game.
 

SurgeOne

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2021
524
813
93
Le'Veon was older and dumber then than Barkley
Barkley will get at or near what McCaffrey got. Those two are both entering their what is usually a RB's 3 year prime window before the fall. Bell was a product of a system. Until last year Barkley had to get around the Giants system.

I agree paying RBs big money is not usually smart but a few are different.
If u watch how teams play D vs the Giants, the ENTIRE D follows Barkley’s every move, and over-commit to stopping him, He’s priority #1. That’s how the Danny Dimes gets so many rushing yards and how anything works for the Giants O. Without Barkley, they will have nothing going for them at all. They’ve got to make him at the top of RB pay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PSUriseANDfire

PSUriseANDfire

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
2,423
3,270
113
If u watch how teams play D vs the Giants, the ENTIRE D follows Barkley’s every move, and over-commit to stopping him, He’s priority #1. That’s how the Danny Dimes gets so many rushing yards and how anything works for the Giants O. Without Barkley, they will have nothing going for them at all. They’ve got to make him at the top of RB pay.
Yeah I a agreed lmao
 

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,619
4,414
113
If u watch how teams play D vs the Giants, the ENTIRE D follows Barkley’s every move, and over-commit to stopping him, He’s priority #1. That’s how the Danny Dimes gets so many rushing yards and how anything works for the Giants O. Without Barkley, they will have nothing going for them at all. They’ve got to make him at the top of RB pay.
Ah no RB are easy to replace. That’s why the tag is the best deal he’ll get
 

BW Lion

Well-known member
Oct 14, 2021
3,103
2,436
113
I don't think Saquon gets near what McCaffrey and Kamara got. The talking heads (one a former NFL GM) on NFL XMSirius were saying the RB franchise tag number will actually go down between this year and next.

There were something like 20 RBs drafted and another 27 signed as rookie free agents. There are just so many productive players out there at RB and the separation of impact isn't worth going from $500k a year to $16 million. It's just not in the current game.
Maybe with Saquon it isn’t about the $$$$. Maybe he wants to, for the first time since high school, enjoy the luxury of running behind an OL that will open holes and allow him to demonstrate his physical gifts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SurgeOne

Midnighter

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
9,839
15,676
113
Barkley suggesting the NFL is - what’s the word….?

The League Collusion GIF


….in an effort to cap the salary of top Rbs….

 
  • Wow
Reactions: BobPSU92

Ludd

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,650
2,160
113
Maybe with Saquon it isn’t about the $$$$. Maybe he wants to, for the first time since high school, enjoy the luxury of running behind an OL that will open holes and allow him to demonstrate his physical gifts.
That’s what I was thinking….maybe he just doesn’t want to play for the Giants anymore and who can blame him?
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login