2021 Eagles Thread

LionJim

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
9,606
13,189
113
so much for the coach picking his team.....
Though they had an early exit, the Eagles made it to the postseason in 2021 — their first season with Nick Sirianni as a head coach and Jalen Hurts as their full-time starting quarterback.

In a season-ending press conference on Wednesday, General Manager Howie Roseman said he feels like Hurts showed enough during 2021 to declare him the starter entering 2022.

www.profootballtalk.com
I was hugely impressed with Hurts against Washington. He’s a coach’s son, too. It was concerning how poorly he made his reads against TB but you have to think that it will eventually click for him. There’s no reason to think he’s another RG3. Honestly, I expect him to improve hugely next year.
 

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,141
4,107
113
I was hugely impressed with Hurts against Washington. He’s a coach’s son, too. It was concerning how poorly he made his reads against TB but you have to think that it will eventually click for him. There’s no reason to think he’s another RG3. Honestly, I expect him to improve hugely next year.
Jim I can only hope you are correct!! But I think the pick he throw in the endzone shows one of the basic problems, and that is lack of arm strength
 

LionJim

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
9,606
13,189
113
Jim I can only hope you are correct!! But I think the pick he throw in the endzone shows one of the basic problems, and that is lack of arm strength
That was a bad read. At the point Hurts was throwing the ball on that play, I can't think of a single quarterback who could have made that throw.
 

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,141
4,107
113
That was a bad read. At the point Hurts was throwing the ball on that play, I can't think of a single quarterback who could have made that throw.
you mean other than Rodgers, Brady, Herbert, Cousins, Stafford among a few. The ball needed to be thrown out of the back of the end zone, and he couldnt do that.
 

LionJim

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
9,606
13,189
113
you mean other than Rodgers, Brady, Herbert, Cousins, Stafford among a few. The ball needed to be thrown out of the back of the end zone, and he couldnt do that.
He wasn’t trying to throw the ball out of the back of the end zone. He was throwing to the front pylon. Your saying “he needed to throw the ball out of the back of the end zone” is just another way of saying it was a bad read. All those other quarterbacks you’re mentioning, if they had thrown to the front pylon just as Hurts had, it would have been incomplete, at best. Bad read. It wasn’t a bad arm that caused that interception. If you want to say that Hurts has a subpar arm, that’s a different discussion and I’m not going to argue with you. But picking that particular play as evidence of a subpar arm doesn’t work for me.
 
Last edited:

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,141
4,107
113
He wasn’t trying to throw the ball out of the back of the end zone. He was throwing to the pylon. Your saying “he should have...” is just another way of saying it was a bad read. All those other quarterbacks you’re mentioning, if they had thrown to the pylon just as Hurts had, it would have been incomplete, at best. Bad read. It wasn’t a bad arm that caused that interception. If you want to say that Hurts has a subpar arm, that’s a different discussion and I’m not going to argue with you. But picking that particular play as evidence of a subpar arm doesn’t work for me.
no, the read was correct, he had the correct receiver, how ever he did not have the arm strength to deliver the ball accurately to the receiver. IIRC the C fall down and the Safety made the pick (without looking up the play again) If he had the arm strength he would have gotten the ball to the Receiver before the Safety could make a play. TD Eagles.
this should be TD Eagles might have to push play and move to about the 5:46 mark best I can do
 
Last edited:

LionJim

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
9,606
13,189
113
no, the read was correct, he had the correct receiver, how ever he did not have the arm strength to deliver the ball accurately to the receiver. IIRC the C fall down and the Safety made the pick (without looking up the play again) If he had the arm strength he would have gotten the ball to the Receiver before the Safety could make a play. TD Eagles.
Okay, you’re saying here that it was the correct read, to throw to the front pylon. (Interception was made at the front pylon.) But in your previous post you said that “the ball needed to be thrown out of the back of the end zone.” So which was the correct read, throwing to the front pylon or throwing it out of the back of the end zone? Edit: check my follow up below.
 
Last edited:

Grant Green

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
2,073
2,999
113
If the ball is thrown to the back of the EZ, I don't think it gets picked. You can see Smith is running toward back of EZ and then has to hit the brakes and come back to the ball. If he meant to throw at the near pylon, bad read. If he meant to throw to the back pylon, bad throw.
 

LionJim

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
9,606
13,189
113
If the ball is thrown to the back of the EZ, I don't think it gets picked. You can see Smith is running toward back of EZ and then has to hit the brakes and come back to the ball. If he meant to throw at the near pylon, bad read. If he meant to throw to the back pylon, bad throw.
Good enough for me. Good clarification on front pylon, back pylon. (This is the kind of precise mathematicians appreciate.) I went back and edited my posts. I was taking about the front pylon. Likely Sluggo was talking about the back pylon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grant Green

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,141
4,107
113
Good enough for me. Good clarification on front pylon, back pylon. (This is the kind of precise mathematicians appreciate.) I went back and edited my posts. I was taking about the front pylon. Likely Sluggo was talking about the back pylon.
I was talking about the receiver. ( thus the read). He picked the correct receiver but didn’t have the arm strength to deliver the ball accurately, which would be over the Safety head toward the back of the EZ
When you say read, to me that means the correct receiver. Ball placement is another factor
 

Nohow

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2021
1,189
949
113
Bottom line: Hurts doesn’t appear to have the arm strength of the elite NFL QBs. He may or may not be otherwise serviceable, but they are not going to any SBs with Hurts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WestSideLion

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,141
4,107
113
Bottom line: Hurts doesn’t appear to have the arm strength of the elite NFL QBs. He may or may not be otherwise serviceable, but they are not going to any SBs with Hurts.
That’s what it looks like to me
 

LionJim

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
9,606
13,189
113
All I can say is that Hurts was trying for the front pylon. The throw was a line drive to the front pylon, and he was not trying to throw to the back of the end zone. So you can’t say that he didn’t have enough arm to throw to the back of the end zone if he wasn’t trying to throw to the back of the end zone. He threw the ball from the 34-yard line and basically you’re saying here that he can’t throw the ball over 35 yards. If he was trying, actually trying, to throw the ball over the safety’s head, then what we saw was the worst throw ever and he doesn’t belong in the NFL.

 

Grant Green

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
2,073
2,999
113
Sounds like the decision has been made boys.


They have to say that. I wouldn't put a ton of stock in it. I would lean toward it meaning that they are not drafting a QB this year, which I don't see as a long term endorsement of Hurts. They can stock up on players while they have him on a rookie contract for a few more years. If he happens to develop a lot in the next year, great. Otherwise, draft a QB in 2023 and have him on a rookie deal for a few years.
 

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,141
4,107
113
All I can say is that Hurts was trying for the front pylon. The throw was a line drive to the front pylon, and he was not trying to throw to the back of the end zone. So you can’t say that he didn’t have enough arm to throw to the back of the end zone if he wasn’t trying to throw to the back of the end zone. He threw the ball from the 34-yard line and basically you’re saying here that he can’t throw the ball over 35 yards. If he was trying, actually trying, to throw the ball over the safety’s head, then what we saw was the worst throw ever and he doesn’t belong in the NFL.


Yup dam close. He threw it to the front because he knows that’s all he had
 

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,141
4,107
113
He's your team's quarterback, not mine. No skin off my nose.
True. And thats what concerns me. It’s hard to significantly change arm strength at This point
Heck if it were up to me I’d bring Nick Foles back
 

nittanyfan333

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
2,760
5,339
113
They have to say that. I wouldn't put a ton of stock in it. I would lean toward it meaning that they are not drafting a QB this year, which I don't see as a long term endorsement of Hurts. They can stock up on players while they have him on a rookie contract for a few more years. If he happens to develop a lot in the next year, great. Otherwise, draft a QB in 2023 and have him on a rookie deal for a few years.

Sorry, my insinuation wasn’t clear. What you said was what I was getting at. Looks like the decision has been made to spend the first rounders on positions other than the QB. Whether that means all 3 get used this year (which I hope because it’s a wicked deep D class) or they see what happens and if someone gets drafted they wanted right before them and their next ranked player is graded in the second and trade down for an extra 1 next year. Point being, I don’t think they’ve decided Hurts is IT, I think they decided Hurts is it FOR NOW. Best thing that could have happened. Broadly speaking, QBs are always a gamble outside of your Lawrence’s and Luck’s of the game. Give me 3 first round graded defensive playmakers on rookie contracts any day over your garden variety first round QB’s not named Lawrence or Luck
 

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,141
4,107
113
Sorry, my insinuation wasn’t clear. What you said was what I was getting at. Looks like the decision has been made to spend the first rounders on positions other than the QB. Whether that means all 3 get used this year (which I hope because it’s a wicked deep D class) or they see what happens and if someone gets drafted they wanted right before them and their next ranked player is graded in the second and trade down for an extra 1 next year. Point being, I don’t think they’ve decided Hurts is IT, I think they decided Hurts is it FOR NOW. Best thing that could have happened. Broadly speaking, QBs are always a gamble outside of your Lawrence’s and Luck’s of the game. Give me 3 first round graded defensive playmakers on rookie contracts any day over your garden variety first round QB’s not named Lawrence or Luck
I’d go with that
 
  • Like
Reactions: Whart

WestSideLion

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
3,011
3,285
113
They have to say that. I wouldn't put a ton of stock in it. I would lean toward it meaning that they are not drafting a QB this year, which I don't see as a long term endorsement of Hurts. They can stock up on players while they have him on a rookie contract for a few more years. If he happens to develop a lot in the next year, great. Otherwise, draft a QB in 2023 and have him on a rookie deal for a few years.
That’s my read too. “We just got out from a huge mistake trading two drafts for Wentz. The last thing we want is to trade another two for an iffy prospect or an expensive older veteran.”

Build a strong team and improve the woeful talent on defense. Solve QB later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grant Green

Tom McAndrew

BWI Staff
Staff member
Oct 27, 2021
48,075
37,081
113
this has gotten a good deal of discussion online and on radio sports talk over the past day.

 

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,141
4,107
113

OTOH......
The Texans interviewed long-time NFL quarterback Josh McCown for the head-coaching job a year ago, despite the fact that McCown has no experience coaching college or pro football, in any capacity. They’ve interviewed him again this year, despite the fact that (checks notes) McCown still has no experience coaching college or pro football, in any capacity.

There’s building chatter in league circles that the Texans really want to hire McCown. Some in the media possibly have been enlisted to spin the notion that it’s not as crazy as it sounds. (It is.)

 

Grant Green

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
2,073
2,999
113

WestSideLion

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
3,011
3,285
113
Worst decision since hiring Joe Kuharich, or brilliant foresight?

https://www.foxnews.com/sports/jalen-hurts-remain-eagles-quarterback-next-season
It just means he

I heard that as he’s our QB going into 2022, not that we’re building around him for 10 years.

Hurts may turn out to be very good. There are some big questions about whether he has the tools to do so.

Example: a weak arm AND a poor ability to see the field and make reads is usually a death sentence for an NFL QB.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

91Joe95

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
2,843
4,065
113
Worst decision since hiring Joe Kuharich, or brilliant foresight?

https://www.foxnews.com/sports/jalen-hurts-remain-eagles-quarterback-next-season
It just means he

"We got to do whatever we can to continue to help him develop," Roseman added. "And how do we do that? By surrounding him with really good players. Players continue to grow. That's a huge part of developing, they grow. How they are in their second year is not how they're going to be in Year 4, 5, 6, and 7. They're also products of the people around them, so that's on us to continue to build this team."

Sounds like WR, OL, and RB focused first round for Eagles fans.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login