This is not inclusivity, it's marketing to one certain (purposely controversial) group. I like the analogy of "Face tattoo syndrome": The only reason someone gets a face tattoo is to make a statement. It's on their face, impossible for the world to miss. Then, when someone notices and says "hey man, what's with the face tattoo?" the tattoo-ee goes and cries on TikTok how toxic or fill-in-the-blank-phobic it is for people to notice his personal life choice of getting his face inked.I really don't know what's wrong with marketing your product to a pro-trans demographic. The only message they are sending is inclusivity.
Bud Light went and got the tattoo. They were apparently already selling very well to the LGBTQ+++ community before that, and nobody said **** about it. I certainly didn't care. But by choosing to tattoo themselves with Mulvaney's ugly mug, they went and made it a topic, as loudly and in the public eye as they could.
So, we get what we had here last week. Which is the way they want it... Well, they get it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02383/02383a2f9d4e9ba705a8b9a8a276452b33bd63e2" alt="1683563188598.png 1683563188598.png"