Clemson and SEC in talks

KingWard

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
6,854
7,201
113
Not saying they should go along with it but I am not sure that matters. I mean I doubt A&M really wanted Texas and Oklahoma in the SEC.
People can keep their pants on. If the SEC wants UPC, South Carolina won't be able to keep them out. And we ain't gonna leave over it, either.
 

Spurman54

Joined Apr 19, 2003
Jan 20, 2022
541
706
93
Mark my words. The ACC and the Big 10 will stay put at 16 teams. Notre Dame has decided to wait and I do not see them joining the ACC and the Big 10. There is just too many issues with Clemson that the SEC will not want to deal with and lets just say this Clemson has burnt a lot of bridges over the years and people have not forgotten. In my personal opinion Clemson cannot get the 75% of the votes by SEC members which would be 11 members. Not going to happen. The ACC and the Big 10 will stay at 16.
 

Spurman54

Joined Apr 19, 2003
Jan 20, 2022
541
706
93
Word is Clemson is asking the SEC to foot the bill for their admittance to the conference whatever that may be.
They certainly think highly of themselves.
The whole school at Clemson is not $300 million. Not going to happen. The ACC will stay in place as the Big 10.
 

Yard_Pimps

Well-known member
Jul 11, 2022
1,046
554
113
Mark my words. The ACC and the Big 10 will stay put at 16 teams. Notre Dame has decided to wait and I do not see them joining the ACC and the Big 10. There is just too many issues with Clemson that the SEC will not want to deal with and lets just say this Clemson has burnt a lot of bridges over the years and people have not forgotten. In my personal opinion Clemson cannot get the 75% of the votes by SEC members which would be 11 members. Not going to happen. The ACC and the Big 10 will stay at 16.
Who exactly is going to block them? I don’t see it being South Carolina. No way the SC legislature would stand by and let the state miss out on a state university getting millions more in revenue. I just don’t see it happening. I know we fans like to say it will because of rivalry and all but I just don’t see the board and legislature letting that happen.

I am by no means defending them just saying how I see this going. If the powers to be in the sec and Clemson both mutually want it to happen, SC is not stopping it. Just see texas as an example. Texas A&M says high.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RTanner

KingWard

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
6,854
7,201
113
Mark my words. The ACC and the Big 10 will stay put at 16 teams. Notre Dame has decided to wait and I do not see them joining the ACC and the Big 10. There is just too many issues with Clemson that the SEC will not want to deal with and lets just say this Clemson has burnt a lot of bridges over the years and people have not forgotten. In my personal opinion Clemson cannot get the 75% of the votes by SEC members which would be 11 members. Not going to happen. The ACC and the Big 10 will stay at 16.
So who would be the ACC's 16th team?
 

GridironGunslinger

Joined Mar 4, 2014
Jan 24, 2022
459
990
93
I usually try to totally avoid these types of takes but I will bite. One sport school argument is a joke. Clemson has historically been a top 20 baseball school and they have recently invested heavily in that to get back to those days. They have added softball and have been to the last 2 tournaments including a super regional and only look to improve. Good at both men and womens soccer including a recent mens national championship. Historically strong in tennis, golf and track and field. Outside of a mediocre mens basketball team and a bad womens program I think sport wise they bring a lot.

Revenue is now based on viewership which is driven by matchups. It is not the old school "tv market." As of right now, Clemson would bring more prime matchups which results in more viewership and more money for everybody.

No doubt that Clemson has benefited from their schedule. They also have limitations because they play in the ACC. If they went to the SEC they would then be able to recruit to the "come play in the SEC" and also have that extra SEC money. There are benefits and downfalls of playing in the SEC or ACC, you cannot just look at one side.
You Tigers are so full of yourselves! The rest of the country could care less about you!
 

TigerRoar8

New member
Jul 9, 2022
10
7
3
You Tigers are so full of yourselves! The rest of the country could care less about you!
Lol. Those glasses are heavily shaded. Just because you might hate Clemson does not mean that other people that enjoy football does not want to watch high quality teams and games. Clemson, for the past 10-12 years has provided that. And again, that adds money to peoples pockets.

It is also interesting how you never address or respond to anything with facts, data or stats. You just kind of throw it out the window and ignore it.
 

Spurman54

Joined Apr 19, 2003
Jan 20, 2022
541
706
93
Lol. Those glasses are heavily shaded. Just because you might hate Clemson does not mean that other people that enjoy football does not want to watch high quality teams and games. Clemson, for the past 10-12 years has provided that. And again, that adds money to peoples pockets.

It is also interesting how you never address or respond to anything with facts, data or stats. You just kind of throw it out the window and ignore it.
What the hell are you doing on a Gamecock site. Noone cares about Clemson on this site and they never will. If you think winning games in the national trailer park league is good, well so be it. Please go to Tigernet. You are not welcome here.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TigerRoar8

Spurman54

Joined Apr 19, 2003
Jan 20, 2022
541
706
93
WYFF CH 4 just reported. Said Clemson spokesman said Clemson would go to SEC without question, if it works out.
SEC to Clemson. Not interested. No value in Clemson whatsoever. Go back to that trailer park league you play in.
 

GridironGunslinger

Joined Mar 4, 2014
Jan 24, 2022
459
990
93
Lol. Those glasses are heavily shaded. Just because you might hate Clemson does not mean that other people that enjoy football does not want to watch high quality teams and games. Clemson, for the past 10-12 years has provided that. And again, that adds money to peoples pockets.

It is also interesting how you never address or respond to anything with facts, data or stats. You just kind of throw it out the window and ignore it.
Hate to tell you this but the SEC is sitting tight at 16 teams. Have fun rotting in the ACC!
 

JoeMorrisonLives

Joined Nov 16, 2020
Feb 6, 2022
6,306
10,231
113
Who exactly is going to block them? I don’t see it being South Carolina. No way the SC legislature would stand by and let the state miss out on a state university getting millions more in revenue. I just don’t see it happening. I know we fans like to say it will because of rivalry and all but I just don’t see the board and legislature letting that happen.

I am by no means defending them just saying how I see this going. If the powers to be in the sec and Clemson both mutually want it to happen, SC is not stopping it. Just see texas as an example. Texas A&M says high.
Clemson would and could NEVER bring the revenues Texas is bringing, people need to learn the difference between apples and oranges.
 

Clempson11

New member
Jul 11, 2022
1
0
1
There is no way that clemson's value is anywhere in the neighborhood of $300 million. Does anyone honestly believe that people in, say Boise, Idaho, would switch channels to watch clemson play? Furthermore, clemson does not bring in any new market to the SEC. So, how is their value, to the SEC and ESPN, anywhere close to $300 million? It's not.
I know you love to hate us but what you are sadly mistaken. I’m not saying the SEC will shell out $300 mil to have us join, but we are a top 10 brand in college football right now.

2021 our games averaged 2.67 million viewers (9th) ahead of Penn state. Florida. A&M. Texas. FSU. Wisconsin. SoCal.

Our game vs UGA was 4th most watched regular season game with 8.9 million viewers. So even if all 5 million SC residents were watching 3.9 million people were tuning in from somewhere else in the country. Maybe even Boise Idaho



 

bayrooster

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2022
2,144
1,587
113
Clemson is a one sport school, that brings nothing else to the table. They will not add revenue to the SEC because they are in a market already SEC strong with USC and UGA. Also, the only reason they are considered elite at this time in football is the result of playing a cupcake schedule that has resulted in guaranteed regular season wins and healthy players for the post season. The SEC grind will result in their never sniffing a conference or national championship again. The SEC gains nothing adding Clemson!
Remember until FSU started their decline, Clemson wasn't sniffing the ACC championship.
 

GridironGunslinger

Joined Mar 4, 2014
Jan 24, 2022
459
990
93
I know you love to hate us but what you are sadly mistaken. I’m not saying the SEC will shell out $300 mil to have us join, but we are a top 10 brand in college football right now.

2021 our games averaged 2.67 million viewers (9th) ahead of Penn state. Florida. A&M. Texas. FSU. Wisconsin. SoCal.

Our game vs UGA was 4th most watched regular season game with 8.9 million viewers. So even if all 5 million SC residents were watching 3.9 million people were tuning in from somewhere else in the country. Maybe even Boise Idaho




I guess UGA had nothing to do with the interest in this game? By the way the population of Georgia is 10.5 million. Your statement is stupid about the number of viewers of the UGA/Clem game. UGA fans are more fanatical than Clem fans. Trust me I live in the Augusta area and have to interact with both. One similarity between UGA and Clem fans is the majority are a bunch of bandwagon rednecks that have never seen the inside of a classroom at either school. You Clem fans need to get over yourselves!
 

Lakemurraycock

Joined Sep 28, 2003
Jan 20, 2022
994
2,733
93
Clemson has 468 million reasons to stay. The SEC is not going to be paying anything out to bring on another team. Any team would have to increase revenue to all the SEC schools. Not happening.
"The current grant-of-rights deal would require a school to be penalized their annual revenue distribution, which was a little more than $36 million for Clemson in 2020-21, multiplied by the number of years remaining on the grant-of-rights contract. That means if the Tigers joined the SEC in 2024 – the same year as Oklahoma and Texas – Clemson would have to pay roughly $468 million to leave the ACC."

https://www.greenvilleonline.com/st...all-sec-2022-acc-grant-of-rights/10022910002/
 

Forkcock

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2022
1,130
1,220
113
What the hell are you doing on a Gamecock site. Noone cares about Clemson on this site and they never will. If you think winning games in the national trailer park league is good, well so be it. Please go to Tigernet. You are not welcome here.
They crave our validation.
 

Yard_Pimps

Well-known member
Jul 11, 2022
1,046
554
113
Look I hate clemson as much as the next Carolina fan but I’m not one to believe they would suddenly lose 5 games a year. They would average 1-2 loses a year same as Georgia or Alabama. If we are discussing the last ten years. Before that yes it would have been more.
 

Thunderstick

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2022
806
578
93
It is also interesting how you never address or respond to anything with facts, data or stats. You just kind of throw it out the window and ignore it.
Fact: Carolina is in the SEC
Fact: Clemson is not (but, is a member of the "Alliance")
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login