Report: Saquon Barkley rejected Giants offer worth up to $14 million

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,619
4,415
113
Speaking of that, check this out. Remember Nick Scott was recruited here as a RB but saw the writing on the wall when Saquon and Miles Sanders were brought in. He then switched to safety. Sanders was drafted in the 2nd round of the 2019 draft and Scott the 7th round of the same draft. Check out their earnings through their first contracts.

Tell me why any sane RB in the league moving forward would bust their nuts during their first contract when they aren't getting rewarded for previous production in the second contract? The second contract is where every other position gets paid paid.

For the second contract Miles did ok and Nick did as well being he's a fringe special teamer.

View attachment 368118


View attachment 368117
I am sure the NYG would love to have SB take MS second contract. Heck they offered him 2x that amount, and SB turned him down.
 

Midnighter

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
9,839
15,676
113
they dont have to replace 40% of their offense with just 1 guy , there are 4 other guys willing to take up the slack.


Schitts Creek Good Luck GIF by CBC
 

PSUJam

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
10,907
19,619
113
I am sure the NYG would love to have SB take MS second contract. Heck they offered him 2x that amount, and SB turned him down.
Kids don't buy offensive lineman jerseys or 2nd and 3rd string RB jerseys, nor do fans come out with the intent to watch them. They want to see stars. The market will reset itself. It's just a matter of time.
 

PSUJam

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
10,907
19,619
113
I am sure the NYG would love to have SB take MS second contract. Heck they offered him 2x that amount, and SB turned him down.
FYI there's a huge population of young fans that are fans of certain players, not one team. The NFL is shooting itself in the foot if they keep allowing the franchise tag. The franchise tag is actually the direct opposite of capitalism, and the owners can falsely dictate a players worth by using it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Penislickoneil

WestSideLion

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
3,377
3,751
113
Just about every NFL kicker has the opportunity to significantly impact the game every week (for better or worse), and there are only a handful of them that make big $$ (by NFL standards).
Most NFL running backs rarely play. There are about 150 of them in the league, 1/2 of them account for 10 yards or less of rushing yards per game - and almost never have a significant impact on the game - and there are 100 guys NOT in the league who could likely step in for most of them without the team skipping a beat.

Now, if one compared the salaries of kickers to STARTING running backs (who are very impactful, and not so easily replaced), I would expect a far different result.

Most of the guys who put on NFL uniforms on Sundays are not rocket surgeons.
Yes. It's basic statistics. There is generally only 1 kicker per NFL team. Those players have an outsized impact on the outcome of games. Each franchise has 3-4 RBs as you say and the vast majority contribute very little to the outcome of games.

If you look at the distribution of salaries and not just the averages, then I think you'll see that kickers are bracketed much closer together and RBs is a much longer-tail distribution of salaries that brings the average way down.
 

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,619
4,415
113
FYI there's a huge population of young fans that are fans of certain players, not one team. The NFL is shooting itself in the foot if they keep allowing the franchise tag. The franchise tag is actually the direct opposite of capitalism, and the owners can falsely dictate a players worth by using it.
Idk about all of that. The NFL has a Union which is to bargain for all their members, which they did
You can look no further than Zeke Elliot and his second contract vs performance for the state of the running back market
 

PSUJam

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
10,907
19,619
113
Idk about all of that. The NFL has a Union which is to bargain for all their members, which they did
You can look no further than Zeke Elliot and his second contract vs performance for the state of the running back market
Your not wrong that it's a NFLPA problem. They trusted that the owners wouldn't collude to keep the best RB salaries down by franchising a group of them this year. Next up for 2024, Jonathan Taylor! His tag number will be even less than Barkley, Jacobs and Pollard's are this year. See how it works?
 

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,619
4,415
113
Your not wrong that it's a NFLPA problem. They trusted that the owners wouldn't collude to keep the best RB salaries down by franchising a group of them this year. Next up for 2024, Jonathan Taylor! His tag number will be even less than Barkley, Jacobs and Pollard's are this year. See how it works?
Collude? Please get over it, just the way things worked out. You don’t think they saw what happened w Jere and Zek?
 

PSUJam

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
10,907
19,619
113
Collude? Please get over it, just the way things worked out. You don’t think they saw what happened w Jere and Zek?
You mean when Zeek got lazy and fat and didn't stay in shape because he got his money. Yeah, I saw that. Typical tOSU guy. You think Saquon would do that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ODShowtime

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,619
4,415
113
You mean when Zeek got lazy and fat and didn't stay in shape because he got his money. Yeah, I saw that. Typical tOSU guy. You think Saquon would do that?
Why even take the risk? You can get somebody younger and cheaper and spend your money elsewhere
 

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,619
4,415
113
The $10.1 million salary will leave Barkley among the NFL’s highest-paid running backs, but the 2018 NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year felt it was a sign of disrespect.
 

Nitt1300

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,132
9,762
113
Sal Palantonio nails it - Giants f*cked up:

“Dan’s right, the NFL running back market is broken Greeny, but the NFL broke the market and they’re going to have to fix it,” Paolantonio said. “So let us put it into perspective right, let’s say Saquon Barkley and the Giants were close as Kimberly said. Maybe about $5 million a year guaranteed money close. That’s two percent, two percent of the of the $225 million salary cap, so you’re basically ruining your team for two percent?”

According to Ryan Dunleavy of the New York Post, the Giants would not up their contract offer of $11 million per year with a guarantee slightly north of $22 million, despite being within $1 million to $2 million of Barkley’s reduced asking price. A figure that Paolantonio believes the organization could have definitely paid given the biger picture of the situation.

“Let’s put it into more perspective, NFL teams collect about $2 million per game in parking revenue. $2 million per game, 17 regular season games, three preseason games, that’s $40 million a year just in parking,” Paolantonio said. “So this is the working definition of pennywise and pound foolish.”

Following the 4 p.m. deadline, Barkley tweeted, “It is what it is.” As the Giants now have an even bigger problem with their running back whose been the engine of their offense. NFL insider Jordan Schultz reported that Barkley will not report to training camp, and ESPN’s Diana Russini even believes there’s a strong chance he could even sit out in Week 1 versus Dallas Cowboys.

“The Giants don’t have a money problem, the Giants now have, as Dan has pointed out, a football problem,” Paolantonio said. “Saquon Barkley is not their running back, he’s their offense, he’s 40% of their offense and you know what Greeny? We’re all right here in the big bad apple, we all came from the big bad apple where things are more expensive and people are paying attention, the Giants are now going to have a public relations problems.”
Someone f*cked up- but I don't think it was the Giants
 
  • Like
Reactions: s1uggo72

marshall23

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
2,912
4,162
113
Some here are out of touch. NFL contracts are about length and guaranteed $. All Other $ figures are subject to circumstances. SB would have signed for 2 year and 23 million guaranteed.
The $10.1 million salary will leave Barkley among the NFL’s highest-paid running backs, but the 2018 NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year felt it was a sign of disrespect.
The disrespect stems from the lack of a long term contract. Perhaps Mr. Barkley who is clearly the "face of the franchise" and the #1 most important weapon felt that he was worthy of a 2 or 3 year deal. The NY Giants have long been a buttoned up organization that values good athletes who are good citizens. In SB they have precisely that. Yet they didn't value it enough to give him an extra 2-3 million guaranteed to get him signed to a 2 year deal. He may feel disrespected.....or the NYG organization is owned by hypocrites?
 

VaDave4PSU

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,992
2,330
113
"Barkley, 26, finished fourth in the NFL with a career-high 1,312 rushing yards last season, ran for 10 touchdowns and tied for the team lead with 57 receptions. He has played in 60 career games over five seasons since being the No. 2 overall draft pick in 2018, when he was named Offensive Rookie of the Year."

---


Stata the year Saquon missed due to injury.
 

BobPSU92

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
17,598
26,600
113
"Barkley, 26, finished fourth in the NFL with a career-high 1,312 rushing yards last season, ran for 10 touchdowns and tied for the team lead with 57 receptions. He has played in 60 career games over five seasons since being the No. 2 overall draft pick in 2018, when he was named Offensive Rookie of the Year."

---


Stata the year Saquon missed due to injury.

Daniel Jones has got this.
 

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,619
4,415
113
From Facebook


How do you convince a man, who has been ultra competitive his entire life, that he has been beaten?
That's what is facing Saquon Barkley now. It's a tough pill to swallow when you are coming off a triumphant year --- excellent all purpose yards and proof that you are a leader on a playoff team. You say and do everything right, according to your team's standards.
When it comes time to reap the rewards, circumstance in the NFL takes away your leverage. Running backs are devalued --- they age, they get hurt, they can be contained, etc.
He's being asked to take on the rigors of the position for just over ten million a year. As a New York player, there's commercial gold to be mined as well. Whereas it is not comparable to the forty million his quarterback received, it ain't chicken feed.
Sitting out the season on principle would be a fruitless gesture. Next year, he'll be a year older and there will be a fresh crop of kids who could flood the market even more.
I'm sure the Giants appreciate what he means to the team, but with a hard cap in the NFL, they have to be realistic. Reports are that their last offer guaranteed twenty two million. That's market rate. It's not fair compared to other position's compensation, but it's what the computer says a running back of his caliber is worth.
Last year, the Giants reportedly offered him thirty six million, which he turned down and rolled the dice. He went out and had the kind of numbers he felt would justify more.
The crystal ball failed him. Regardless, he can still make generational money. Let's hope both sides can find a compromise they can live with. In the NFL, even great stars are deemed expendable. It's a sad fact in pro football.
 

LionsAndBears

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2021
1,789
3,118
113
If I was Barkley I would stop talking publicly, sign the 1 year tag for $10 million, ball out and then explore Free Agency. IMO, any other choice would be fruitless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OhioLion

PSUJam

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
10,907
19,619
113
Last year, the Giants reportedly offered him thirty six million, which he turned down and rolled the dice.
That's funny. How much was guaranteed?

They could have offered him $100 million over 3 years with $22 million guaranteed over the first two years with a team out for the 3rd. That's a 2 year deal worth $22mm. I don't know why you don't understand this and keep posting this garbage.
 

Nitt1300

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,132
9,762
113
Pretend that this involves some player named John Smith who played his college football at UCLA and ask yourself what your opinion would be.

We all love Saquon, but I think he's playing a losing game here. There is no such thing as "fairness" in business. What you are selling is only worth what someone will pay you for it.
 

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,619
4,415
113
That's funny. How much was guaranteed?

They could have offered him $100 million over 3 years with $22 million guaranteed over the first two years with a team out for the 3rd. That's a 2 year deal worth $22mm. I don't know why you don't understand this and keep posting this garbage.
That leaves the giants w a $78 mil cap hit, so why would they do that?
I don’t know why you don’t understand this
 
  • Like
Reactions: CBusLion10

BobPSU92

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
17,598
26,600
113
Pretend that this involves some player named John Smith who played his college football at UCLA and ask yourself what your opinion would be.

We all love Saquon, but I think he's playing a losing game here. There is no such thing as "fairness" in business. What you are selling is only worth what someone will pay you for it.

But being a Penn Stater always makes it worse.
 

BobPSU92

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
17,598
26,600
113
Sadly, Saquon has forgotten the all-important tenet: He’s just lucky to be playing football.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login