Any money that isn't guaranteed in the contract is imaginary money. Even the $78mm cap hit money is imaginary money that that doesn't get paid out. Would it be good business to have a huge cap hit? No. Look at the Rams. But at least they can say they won a SB recently.That leaves the giants w a $78 mil cap hit, so why would they do that?
I don’t know why you don’t understand this
real imaginary does not matter to clubs, its all about the cap. People saw what happened to Zeek, they would rather go younger and cheaper.Any money that isn't guaranteed in the contract is imaginary money. Even the $78mm cap hit money is imaginary money that that doesn't get paid out. Would it be good business to have a huge cap hit? No. Look at the Rams. But at least they can say they won a SB recently.
real imaginary does not matter to clubs, its all about the cap. People saw what happened to Zeek, they would rather go younger and cheaper.
and Zeke is out of the league!And faster and better-looking. ZEKE.is slow and ugly.
Saquon beats ZEKE.on both counts.
You talk from an ownership perspective and all along I've been talking from the players perspective. It is what it is. The Giants are going to suck either way. They have a mid QB and washed up WR's. Their TE and RB are the only reason to watch. It's clear they are going to be the 3rd best team in NY state.real imaginary does not matter to clubs, its all about the cap. People saw what happened to Zeek, they would rather go younger and cheaper.
and Zeke is out of the league!
Sluggo, that $78M wouldn’t count against the cap if not guaranteed. The Giants would cut him after year 2 and save the $78M. It would be imaginary for this exercise.real imaginary does not matter to clubs, its all about the cap. People saw what happened to Zeek, they would rather go younger and cheaper.
Sluggo, that $78M wouldn’t count against the cap if not guaranteed. The Giants would cut him after year 2 and save the $78M. It would be imaginary for this exercise.
I am not so sure about that Then why do people get in cap jail??Sluggo, that $78M wouldn’t count against the cap if not guaranteed. The Giants would cut him after year 2 and save the $78M. It would be imaginary for this exercise.
Maybe the Giants will just put 11 offensive linemen on the field at the same time to make you happy.Just think if the NYG did this, they could sign 3 veteran OL looking for work, for the price of the franchise tag. We will see.
![]()
Don't be surprised if the Raiders eventually yank Josh Jacobs's franchise tag
The NFL's leading rusher in 2022 could still be on the move.www.nbcsports.com
I am not sure what this meansMaybe the Giants will just put 11 offensive linemen on the field at the same time to make you happy.
Why would the Giants sign more offensive linemen when their skilled offensive players outside of Barkley and Waller are a clown show?I am not sure what this means
Why would the Giants sign more offensive linemen when their skilled offensive players outside of Barkley and Waller are a clown show?
The signing bonus would count toward the $22 million guaranteed. Anything beyond that could be wiped out by cutting the guy after year 2.I am not so sure about that Then why do people get in cap jail??
I don’t think the guarantee is the big trigger, it is how much has already been paid in a signing bonus. That is what needs to be accounted for. So if none of the $78 is part of a signing bonus, I think there is no cap hit if he’s released.
the simply reality is, only money that is truly guaranteed is what is in your pocket as signing bonus.
Well as soon as he signs the paper he is guaranteed the $10 mil + no matter whatOK this may sound silly but isn't this some kind of silliness anyways ? Saquan and the Giants come up with an agreement if he gets injured or suks ....... he doesn't get the $$$. If he hits some sort of benchmark he gets the $$$.
Yes but he wouldn’t do that he’d sign right before 2023 would become a countable yr for service. Which I believe is w 7 games left. If he did that n got hurt it would be a countable yrWhat is the deal worth if he signs it just before the point of no return that makes him '23 ineligible? $10 million divided up over 17 games, multiplied by the ones he plays?
Yes but he wouldn’t do that he’d sign right before 2023 would become a countable yr for service. Which I believe is w 7 games left. If he did that n got hurt it would be a countable yr
And perhaps we r saying the same thing
The reality his best leverage is to sign the tender come into camp and prove himself indispensable. Have the fans pressure the team. Have the Giants win a playoff game or 2I think we are. I know there is a deadline for it to be a counted year, but I'm just verifying how much of the $10 mil he gets if he waits until the deadline. Is the money strictly divided up per game on these deals?
His best leverage is to play the minimum # of games he has to. That way, he still gets paid, and still gets a service year. Additionally, if the Giants stink without him and do better with him, he's proving his point. If the Giants can win without him, Barkley loses that leverage. Regardless, if it's strictly about money invested in a RB, a trade would be the best.
You can buy a lot of books with 10 million.“AFTER THE SAQUON NEWS, IF I’M A TOP HIGH SCHOOL RUNNING BACK, I’M HITTING THE BOOKS HARD.”
![]()
Agree. I think that SB and the other running backs have a legitimate gripe but the free market rules. Always has, always will. The Giants could have handled the whole issue with more respect and generosity, sure, but they decided not to, their choice, all’s fair. And the fact of the matter is that there are a ton of good backs out there. I think it’s in Saquon’s best interest to sign the tender.The reality his best leverage is to sign the tender come into camp and prove himself indispensable. Have the fans pressure the team. Have the Giants win a playoff game or 2
He already did just that and it didn’t help. They made the playoffs and won a playoff game….neither would have happened without him.The reality his best leverage is to sign the tender come into camp and prove himself indispensable. Have the fans pressure the team. Have the Giants win a playoff game or 2
He has no leverage. If I were advising him, I’d tell him to treat each year as if it’s his last. At that position, it very well could be at any time. Take the $10.1m and play. I’m not sure if you can do this, but maybe he could have had a play where he plays under the tag with the agreement that the Giants NOT franchise him after this year. So, he either gets a non tag contract after next year or he’s cut.He already did just that and it didn’t help. They made the playoffs and won a playoff game….neither would have happened without him.
He is indispensable. The Giant offense consists of giving the ball to 26 and then faking it to him and Jones keeping. They won't win 7 games without him.The reality his best leverage is to sign the tender come into camp and prove himself indispensable. Have the fans pressure the team. Have the Giants win a playoff game or 2
Too late for him to get really good at soccer? Pro Euro leagues throw around money like it’s nothing.
He hasn’t signed his tenderHe already did just that and it didn’t help. They made the playoffs and won a playoff game….neither would have happened without him.
The reality his best leverage is to sign the tender come into camp and prove himself indispensable. Have the fans pressure the team. Have the Giants win a playoff game or 2
But but but it's a free market.Isn't that what he did in '22? What do you think happens in '24 if he plays great in '23? Tagged, again.
But at a 20% increase guaranteedIsn't that what he did in '22? What do you think happens in '24 if he plays great in '23? Tagged, again.
It’s unfortunate that college football is more of a free market than professional football….something wrong with that picture.But but but it's a free market.![]()
It’s unfortunate that college football is more of a free market than professional football….something wrong with that picture.
LOL. they are tried that more than once, it didnt happen. The last thing the NFL wants is guaranteed contracts, if they had that, there wouldnt be games on Sunday!NFL is the only one of the major leagues without fully guaranteed contracts. If I'm the NFLPA, I sit until that's changed. Zero reason for the most popular sport, with the most parity and best athletes, to pull this BS.
LOL. they are tried that more than once, it didnt happen. The last thing the NFL wants is guaranteed contracts, if they had that, there wouldnt be games on Sunday!