BWI Sport Betting Thread

Sep 17, 2024
172
156
43
I don't think I've heard one person favor BYU this week. UCF seems to be on everyone's card. I got lucky and bet UCF at +2 and +107 (sprinkle) right before it moved to -2. I see juiced -2.5s now. May still be a good number, but at very least, be wary of betting BYU.
So what are your thoughts about the following?

1) UCF has lost 5 in a row
2) UCF's only wins came early in the season against New Hampshire, Sam Houston St and TCU
3) BYU is 7-0, but their road victories are suspect... @ SMU 18-15;@ Wyoming 34-14; @ Baylor 34-28
4) UCF is favored by 1-2 pts. Are their injuries or weather one should consider?
 

Grant Green

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,994
2,932
113
So what are your thoughts about the following?

1) UCF has lost 5 in a row
2) UCF's only wins came early in the season against New Hampshire, Sam Houston St and TCU
3) BYU is 7-0, but their road victories are suspect... @ SMU 18-15;@ Wyoming 34-14; @ Baylor 34-28
4) UCF is favored by 1-2 pts. Are their injuries or weather one should consider?
The general consensus I get from a lot of listening is that BYU has been on the lucky side of things. I don't think they are quite as good as their record.

UCF has switched QBs from KJ Jefferson to Jacurri Brown which has made a difference. Way better runner which fits the Gus system better. Should have beat iowa state last week.

No injuries or weather that I know of, but I suspect that Byu may struggle with humidity as the game goes on.

I won a similar bet last year when a highly touted ok st came to a disappointing ucf mid to late season and got waxed. Hoping for a similar result this year. Ucf has lost five in a row which is often a good time to buy on a team as they are undervalued.
 

MtNittany

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,251
1,709
113
Tulane, Memphis, IU, Navy, BYU (yes), Tosu, PSU, PSU 2nd half spread today.

B.O.B. and Boise got me off to a good start w/ covers last night.
 
Last edited:

MtNittany

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,251
1,709
113
Sheesh. I had Tulane -8 and Tulane/Over parlayed. NTSU scored a TD w/ 47 seconds left, after converting two 4th downs to lose by 8. $500 I really thought I had in my pocket. Oh well.
 

Moogy

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2021
1,748
1,290
113
The general consensus I get from a lot of listening is that BYU has been on the lucky side of things. I don't think they are quite as good as their record.

UCF has switched QBs from KJ Jefferson to Jacurri Brown which has made a difference. Way better runner which fits the Gus system better. Should have beat iowa state last week.

No injuries or weather that I know of, but I suspect that Byu may struggle with humidity as the game goes on.

I won a similar bet last year when a highly touted ok st came to a disappointing ucf mid to late season and got waxed. Hoping for a similar result this year. Ucf has lost five in a row which is often a good time to buy on a team as they are undervalued.
Sometimes you're the windshield ... and sometimes you're the bug.
 

Moogy

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2021
1,748
1,290
113
The beauty of sports betting is you can be wrong 46% of the time And be very profitable. Most people have a hard time with this concept.

I can always tell which gamblers are terrible. Because they always win. Just ask them. And usually you don't have to - they'll volunteer the information. Every week they'll talk about their 5 wins. Or maybe 4, and those darned refs screwed them out of the 5th. Meanwhile, they aren't telling you about their 7 (or more) losses. I knew a couple of guys like that .. down the line, they ended up in SERIOUS financial trouble because of their gambling losses.
 
Sep 17, 2024
172
156
43
I can always tell which gamblers are terrible. Because they always win. Just ask them. And usually you don't have to - they'll volunteer the information. Every week they'll talk about their 5 wins. Or maybe 4, and those darned refs screwed them out of the 5th. Meanwhile, they aren't telling you about their 7 (or more) losses. I knew a couple of guys like that .. down the line, they ended up in SERIOUS financial trouble because of their gambling losses.
Why are you so preoccupied with other people's hobbies?

If you don't enjoy or condone sports wagering, perhaps you should just refrain from reading and participating in this thread. Just an idea.
 

Moogy

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2021
1,748
1,290
113
Why are you so preoccupied with other people's hobbies?

If you don't enjoy or condone sports wagering, perhaps you should just refrain from reading and participating in this thread. Just an idea.
Wut?

Why are you following me around, attempting to criticize me, but always being off the mark?

I have nothing against sports gambling. I like it. I follow it. Used to do it, but I stopped - even though it was a tiny, tiny financial involvement - simply to avoid any appearance of impropriety given what I currently do. I still do it "dry" ... I'll make my picks, but not put down any actual wagers.
I just shared my experience with it. Even when I was on a heater, I almost only ever talked about my absolute crap bets, or my bad beats. You would have thought I'd never won. The guys who only ever mentioned their wins, however ... those were the ones who were losing.

You're preoccupied with me, seemingly. I will criticize that "hobby."
 
Last edited:

Grant Green

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,994
2,932
113
I can always tell which gamblers are terrible. Because they always win. Just ask them. And usually you don't have to - they'll volunteer the information. Every week they'll talk about their 5 wins. Or maybe 4, and those darned refs screwed them out of the 5th. Meanwhile, they aren't telling you about their 7 (or more) losses. I knew a couple of guys like that .. down the line, they ended up in SERIOUS financial trouble because of their gambling losses.
So you won't believe me if I tell you I was 10-1 today;)
 

Moogy

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2021
1,748
1,290
113
So you won't believe me if I tell you I was 10-1 today;)
LOL. Poop happens. Sometimes you go on hot streaks. Sometimes you're ice cold. If I knew you well enough to know you were also owning up to your losses, I'd believe you. If you were one of those folks who never told anyone your bets beforehand, but also only ever said things about your positive bets ... and those comments weren't that frequent, even though we knew you were betting a lot ... then, that's different.
 

CDLionFL

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2021
1,240
1,826
113
Welp, no way I was going to match or even come close to my 11-1-1 day I had last Saturday. But there was no need to threaten to go the other way with it!!

The Good -- not listening to everyone about BYU-UCF, riding the IU train, correctly wondering how NW was going to score on Iowa

The Bad -- not believing in PSU, thinking Syracuse-Pitt would be close, diving back into the 1-AA pool and finding no water

The Ugly -- falling asleep late in the 3:30 window and waking up after Miami-FSU had kicked and it was 7-0. So instead of betting Miami -20 1/2 like I wanted to, I live bet Miami -27 1/2. FSU scores in the final minute and the game ends 36-14.

Saved by a couple of hockey bets late and a 7-team ML parlay that paid +350 so it was a blah day rather than a rough day.
 

MtNittany

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,251
1,709
113
Welp, no way I was going to match or even come close to my 11-1-1 day I had last Saturday. But there was no need to threaten to go the other way with it!!

The Good -- not listening to everyone about BYU-UCF, riding the IU train, correctly wondering how NW was going to score on Iowa

The Bad -- not believing in PSU, thinking Syracuse-Pitt would be close, diving back into the 1-AA pool and finding no water

The Ugly -- falling asleep late in the 3:30 window and waking up after Miami-FSU had kicked and it was 7-0. So instead of betting Miami -20 1/2 like I wanted to, I live bet Miami -27 1/2. FSU scores in the final minute and the game ends 36-14.

Saved by a couple of hockey bets late and a 7-team ML parlay that paid +350 so it was a blah day rather than a rough day.
I've been betting PSU and the 2nd half line for 2 games now (-3.5 yesterday). 2 winners. I also had them at -6.5 and in game -1.5. Another hedge I used yesterday was a $10 bet - 1st half winner (WI) and game winner (PSU) parlayed. Paid $70.
 

Grant Green

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,994
2,932
113
Welp, no way I was going to match or even come close to my 11-1-1 day I had last Saturday. But there was no need to threaten to go the other way with it!!

The Good -- not listening to everyone about BYU-UCF, riding the IU train, correctly wondering how NW was going to score on Iowa

The Bad -- not believing in PSU, thinking Syracuse-Pitt would be close, diving back into the 1-AA pool and finding no water

The Ugly -- falling asleep late in the 3:30 window and waking up after Miami-FSU had kicked and it was 7-0. So instead of betting Miami -20 1/2 like I wanted to, I live bet Miami -27 1/2. FSU scores in the final minute and the game ends 36-14.

Saved by a couple of hockey bets late and a 7-team ML parlay that paid +350 so it was a blah day rather than a rough day.
I wouldn't take anything from the Pitt vs Syracuse game. I can't ever remember a game where there has been 3 pick 6's at any level (plus 2 more INTs). I'll give some credit to Pitt's defense, but that is also very unlucky. However, I wouldn't pass judgement on a handicap in a game like that.
 

Erial_Lion

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
1,573
1,975
113
I wouldn't take anything from the Pitt vs Syracuse game. I can't ever remember a game where there has been 3 pick 6's at any level (plus 2 more INTs). I'll give some credit to Pitt's defense, but that is also very unlucky. However, I wouldn't pass judgement on a handicap in a game like that.
While you're making sense of Box Scores, please break down the Lions-Titans game for me...possibly the weirdest one I've ever seen.
 

Grant Green

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,994
2,932
113
Misleading box scores for Week 9. There were a few more G5 games, but it was late and I didn't write them down.

ScoreYardsYPPTOs marg
GA Tech63564.4-2
Va Tech212333.5
Note: GA Tech also 1/5 on 4th down
MSU173525.4-1
UM242655.2
LSU234295.9-2
TAM383765.4
UW173185.5-1
IU313124.4
Note: While UW should have made this a closer game, this is now the 3rd game where UW has won the box score and lost the game. Something up with their mojo. All three were B10 games travelling 2+ time zones.

EDIT FOR ADD NOTES: Almost forgot to add a few notes I made to myself.
Duke was +6 in TOs and still lost to SMU. I don't know how much longer the Duke TO fortune can continue.
Navy was also -6 in TOs. Never going to cover like that.
 
Last edited:

Grant Green

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,994
2,932
113
While you're making sense of Box Scores, please break down the Lions-Titans game for me...possibly the weirdest one I've ever seen.
Oh my! I was travelling and didn't do NFL yet, but just looked. That could be the most misleading box score ever. Ten outgained Det 416 to 225, 5.9 ypp to 4.8, but was -4 in TOs. Were there special teams TDs?
 

Grant Green

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,994
2,932
113
UO and UCLA cover and USC does not. B10 teams travelling 2+ time zones now 5-11 ATS.

PSA for Indiana fans. Rourke will be out for at least a few weeks.

Add note: Louisville is in a huge sandwich spot this week at BC, playing a tough game vs Miami last week and playing Clemson next week.
USC covers vs Rutgers, IU covers vs UW, Oregon covers vs Illinois.
B10 traveling 2+ times zones now 5-14 ATS.

bonus note- BC did cover in the Louisville sandwich spot.
 

Erial_Lion

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
1,573
1,975
113
For those without ESPN+, an excerpt from an article today that touched on the Lions/Titans game...


Like, a billion: That's how many weird stats I have about the Lions' win over the Titans, via ESPN Research:

  • The Lions are the first team in NFL history to win by 30-plus points yet be outgained by at least 150 yards since 1933 (which is the first year someone was, like, "Hey, we should keep track of how many yards these teams got in this game").
  • The Lions scored 52 points despite only totaling 225 yards of offense, which is the second-fewest yards gained in a 50-plus-point outing in NFL history (shoutout to the 1941 Packers).
  • The Lions had 61 net passing yards, which is the second-fewest passing yards gained in a 50-plus-point outing in NFL history (shoutout to the 1950 Giants).
OK, that's yards. Now drives:

  • The Lions had four touchdown drives of 25 or fewer yards. They're the second team to ever have that many touchdown drives under 25 yards, joining the 1988 Houston Oilers.
  • The Lions had five touchdown drives of 30 or fewer yards. Going as far back as the Elias Sports Bureau has data (1978), that had never happened until Sunday.
  • The Lions also had five touchdown drives of four or fewer total plays -- only the sixth time that has happened in a single game this century.
  • The Lions' average starting field position for the full game was their own 41.8-yard line, the fourth-best starting field position for a game this season.
Just a preposterous game. One in a million.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login